Must Listen: Michigan’s sex offender registry needs reform, U.S. Supreme Court decides

News from SCOTUS on Sex Offender Laws

Please click the link below to hear J.J. Prescott, a University of Michigan law professor and expert on sex offender laws, talk about the state of the sex offender registry in Michigan, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision not to review a lower court’s ruling that the registry violates Ex Post Facto Laws.

 


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “Must Listen: Michigan’s sex offender registry needs reform, U.S. Supreme Court decides

  • March 4, 2018

    Well I’m a women on the MI sex offender list and I’ve got to register every 3 month’s how do i just come on a vacation to FL?

    Reply
    • March 9, 2018

      Dear Lord ma’am. Do not come to floriduh on vacation. You would be jumping from the frying-pan into the proverbial fires of hell. If floriduh can include you on its registry for being here, they will. You will never be removed from the floriduh registry, even after your passing. If you fail to notify our Nazis of your visit and are caught, you will have come to floriduh on vacation and leave on probation…or worse. floriduh does not respect its own constitution, so they sure as heck ain’t gonna apply any law fairly to you. This piece of shite state is the last place on earth any rso should want to travel. Good luck and God bless.

      Reply
  • October 5, 2017

    Thanks to the Michigan law I’m faced with the retroactive law. My crime was in 1984, 33 years ago .Never had to register as a sex offender for over 20 years. Can it get any worse?

    Reply
  • October 4, 2017

    A voice of common sense and reason. I’m in Colorado where the law is based on the crime and has no risk assessment. There is virtually no exit strategy and Colorado is currently on the trajectory path of California.

    Reply
  • October 4, 2017

    So does this mean the XPF,law from that circuit court is canceled, it’s back to the regular harassment for people who were sentenced before 1996 ??

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *