PA: Another case finds Pennsylvania registry violates state and federal ex post facto prohibition
In an opinion issued yesterday in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, a person forced to register as a sex offender had the registry declared unconstitutional as applied to him, an individual whose offense was committed prior to the date of the registry or certain of it’s provisions.
You can read the 58 page, well-reasoned opinion here: t.s._v._psp
Pennsylvania had previously and recently (2017) had it’s registry declared unconstitutional (Commonwealth v. Muniz), but then the legislature went back and tried to fix the constitutional issues. The significance of this recent case is that the Court concluded that the changes made by the PA General Assembly in an effort to correct the deficiencies the Supreme Court had found in Muniz do not sufficiently alter the balance test of whether the law is punitive.
The following excerpt from the opinion is very telling: Petitioner is subject to arrest and criminal sanction if he does not verify his residence, notify PSP of changes,or appear for in-person registration, 42 Pa.C.S. §9799.56(d). Consistent with our Supreme Court’s precedent, and following Muniz, we discern no material difference between the conditions imposed in probation and the conditions imposed upon Petitioner under subchapter I of Act 29.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Good. We’ve been holding our breath hoping this happens in Florida.
Lx
Some of us have been holding out breaths since 1997 when this first came out and we are turning numerous shades of green. Not sure how much longer some of us have left. Getting off the registry when I am sent off to a nursing home isn’t my idea of a victory.
I would like to have a few years of freedom. My Dad is in his 80s, all my other relatives moved away. If I was to get a failure to register arrest and end up back incarcerated, my Mother would be all alone.