Residency Restrictions by State (for persons required to register as sex offenders)
The following table was extracted from a 2018 study entitled, “Sex offender residence restrictions and sex crimes against children: A comprehensive review” by Joanne Savage and Casey Windsor.
It is a useful resource to determine which States have a Sex Offender Residency Restriction (SORR) and against who they apply.
Please note that these are STATE restrictions. Municipalities (County and City) might have harsher restrictions (as in the case of Florida).
|
STATE |
OFFENDER (2018) |
RESTRICTIONS AS OF 2018 |
|
ALABAMA |
All adult sex offenders |
2000 ft of schools, childcare facilities or resident camps |
|
ALASKA |
NONE |
|
|
ARIZONA |
Adults convicted of a dangerous crime against children, |
1000 ft of schools, child care facilities |
|
ARKANSAS |
Level 3 or 4 sex offenders |
2000 ft. of schools, public parks, youth centers, or daycare facilities. Level 4 sex offenders may not reside within 2000 ft. of a church or place of worship |
|
CALIFORNIA |
Parolees |
2000 ft of schools or parks where children regulary gather. 1/2 mile of schools, 2000 ft of parks where children regularly gather |
|
COLORADO |
NONE |
|
|
CONNECTICUT |
1000 ft of a public or private elementary or secondary, or (2) a facility where child day care services are provided | |
|
DELAWARE |
Any sexual offender |
500 ft of schools |
|
FLORIDA |
Any sexual offender with victim under 16 years old |
1000 ft. of schools, child care facilities, parks or playgrounds |
|
GEORGIA |
Registered offenders |
1000 ft. of child care facilities, churches, schools, or any area where minors congregate (explicity includes parks, recreation facilities, playgrounds, skating rinks, neighborhood centers, gymnasiums, school bus stops, public libraries, or public community swimming pools) |
|
HAWAII |
NONE |
|
|
IDAHO |
Adult criminal sex offenders |
500 ft of schools |
|
ILLINOIS |
Sex offender with child victim |
500 ft. of schools, playgrounds, child care institutions, day care centers, day care homes, or any facility providing programs or services exclusively directed toward persons under 18 years of age |
|
INDIANA |
Sex offender with child victim |
1000 ft of a school, youth program center, public park |
|
IOWA |
Adult sex offender convicted of aggravated offense against |
2000 ft. of a school or child care facility |
|
KANSAS |
NONE |
|
|
KENTUCKY |
Sex offender registrants |
1000 ft. of a school, preschool, publicity owned playground or day care facility |
|
LOUISIANA |
Sex offender |
1000 ft. of schools, child care facilities, public parks or recreational facilities 1000 ft. of schools, child care facilities, public parks or recreational facilities, group homes, residential homes, playgrounds, youth centers, public swimming pools, or free standing video arcades |
|
MAINE |
(Allows municipalities to prohibit residence by offenders up to a maximum distance of 750 ft from schools) |
|
|
MARYLAND |
NONE |
|
|
MASSACHUSETTS |
NONE |
|
|
MICHIGAN |
Registered offenders |
NONE |
|
MISSOURI |
All sex offenders |
1000 ft. of schools or child care facilities |
|
MINNESOTA |
NONE |
|
|
MISSISSIPPI |
Any person convicted of registrable sex offense, including those acquitted by reason of insanity |
3000 ft. of schools, child care facilities, children’s group homes, playgrounds, ballparks, or other recreational facilities utilized by persons under the age of eighteen |
|
MONTANA |
High-risk |
300 ft. of schools, day-care centers, playgrounds, developed or improved parks, athletic fields or facilities that primarily serve minors Judge shall impose conditions of probation, parole, etc. restricting residency in proximity to schools, preschools, day-care centers, churches, or public parks |
|
NEBRASKA |
(Allows political subdivisions to prohibit residence by “sexual predators” up to a maxiumum distance of 500 ft. from schools or child care facilities) | |
|
NEVADA |
NONE |
|
|
NEW HAMPHIRE |
(Bill to ban municipalities from adopting residence restrictions under study in the Senate) | |
|
NEW JERSEY |
NONE |
|
|
NEW MEXICO |
NONE |
|
|
NEW YORK |
Parolees |
At discretion of parole or probation department, offender may be restricted from living within 1000 ft of a school or other facility caring for children. (New proposal in state legislature 2017-2018 session would impose 1000 ft. restrictions to all sex offenders) |
|
NORTH CAROLINA |
Sex offender registrants |
1000 ft. of schools or child day-care centers |
|
NORTH DAKATA |
High risk sex offenders |
500 ft. of schools or pre-schools |
|
OHIO |
Sex offenders against child victim |
1000 ft of schools or child day-care centers |
|
OKLAHOMA |
Registered sex offenders |
2000 ft. from schools, “educational institutions.” property used by an organization whose primary purpose is working with children, playgrounds, or parks |
|
OREGON |
Parolees and probationers |
(The law provides a general prohibition to the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison supervision against allowing a sex offender to reside near locations where children are the primary occupants or users) |
|
PENNSYLVANIA |
(No state law, but numerous local laws) | |
|
RHODE ISLAND |
Those required t |
300 ft . of schools 1000 ft of schools |
|
SOUTH CAROLINA |
Sex offenders with child victim |
1000 ft. of schools, daycare centers, children’s recreational facilities, parks or public playgrounds |
|
SOUTH DAKOTA |
Those required to register as a sex offender |
500 ft from schools, public parks, public playgrounds, or public pools |
|
TENNESSEE |
Adult sex offenders, more than 3 years older than the victim, convicted of rape, forcible sodomy upon child <13, object sexual penetration on child <13 |
500 ft. of schools or child day centers |
|
TEXAS |
Sex offender probationers and parolees with child victim |
Subject ot case-by-case “Child Safety Zone” (premises where children commmonly gather, including a school, day-care facility, playground, public or private youth center, public swimming pool, or video arcade facility) (Numerous local laws-many of which repealed in recent years) |
|
UTAH |
NONE |
|
|
VERMONT |
NONE |
|
|
VIRGINA |
Adult sex offender, more than three years older than the |
500 ft. of schools, child day centers |
|
WASHINGTON |
Parolees |
Depart of Corrections authorized to reject proposed residence in close proximity to schools, child care centers, playgrounds, or other facilities where children of similar age or circumstance as a previous victim are present. For high-risk offenders DOC may restrict residence to 880 feet from facilities and grounds of a public or private school (“community protection zone”) |
|
WEST VIRGINA |
Adult sex offenders |
1000 ft of schools or child care facilities |
|
WISCONSIN |
Violent sex offenders |
1500 ft of schools, day care centers, youth centers, churches or public parks |
|
WYOMING |
Those required to register |
1000 ft. of schools |
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It would be interesting if a research group would look into whether or not these differences make any differences in Public safety, since that is the stated basis for SOR laws. If there are 12 states without restrictions whatsoever, then there should be a way to determine if they help at all in the States that have them.
Research has shown pretty conclusively that SORRs do not promote public safety and in fact slightly detract from it.
The laws remain popular, but perhaps not for the reasons stated.
The research is pretty clear that they decrease public safety by making more sex offenders homeless. The police usually don’t like the restrictions since it’s hard to track homeless offenders.
In regards to Florida, this is not accurate. I am registered here but I have no residency restrictions. My charges are not listed in state law or the local ordinance where I live. It lists which specific statutes the residency restrictions apply to.
http://m.flsenate.gov/laws/statutes/2018/775.215
I mentioned this to a detective at my registration office and he agreed with me. Made a note in the system stating so. It took years for them to listen to me and they finally agreed when they were initially trying to kick me out of my apartment.
You are correct, Noel. The STATE SORR does not apply to ALL registrants, only those post 2004, who have designated crimes, against a minor (under 16).
This chart is intended to be a guideline but not a comprehensive resource.
I am from Missouri and was convicted of2nd degree sexual assault I was27 she was16 what kind of restrictions would I have if I move to Florida?
The registration requirements can be found in Florida Statutes 943.0435 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0900-0999/0943/Sections/0943.0435.html
They generally increase every other year.
Additionally, you’ll have county ordinances (such as a residency restriction or proximity ordinance) in the county you decide to move to. Additional to that, the city will likely have its own ordinances on top of that.
Please I beg of anyone that has any information about this subject please guide me,
I’ve contacted the state that I was convicted in and the guy who is in charge of so’s
He is the one who decides who is on the registry, well I have submitted to him the laws for my crime and the paperwork ( abstract of judgement) signed by the judge; where it plainly states that there was no special stipulation set forth for me to do, now during my commitment in prison the laws changed but in 2008 Indiana ( this where I committed my crime) said that sex crimes are unconstitutional and there fore not to be retroactive , meaning that they could not make so’s go and do what the new laws are required to do, so idoc ( Indiana Department of Correction)
Were to remove all offenders who were made to register , well my crime was one of them , but was not done so. I moved out of Indiana in 2009 to South Carolina and they contacted Indiana and they told me that if Indiana was to remove me then they would do so. Well they didn’t, in 2014 I moved to Florida, well I finally get Indiana to remove my name and Florida says to get the paperwork to them and they will do so also well I do this and then Florida says that South Carolina still has me on the registry long story short if Indiana would of done what they were supposed to do I wouldn’t have to on the registry, well
The head guy tells me that Indiana does not have me on the registry and that my argument is with South Carolina and Florida, but I keep trying to tell him he was in violation of the judges orders and the civil court on when they passed the new law. So he says that I am not on Indiana registry so he doesn’t have any additional information for me , what can I do about this ? Please I beg for any help on this issue ty.
Donald, the ONLY person you should be asking for advise from is someone licensed to practice law in these states.
FAC, I’m classified as an offender (I took a plea in 2003). I’m looking to purchase property in Duval (for homesteading) that’s within 1000 ft. of a (possible) daycare. Am I understanding correctly (regarding current state and local residency restrictions) that this should not be an issue for me?
Is there any database/resource that lists daycare locations in Duval? It would be great to know before I buy :).
In Duval, it is 2500 feet from a school, park, or daycare. It is tough to find a place if you are retired. We searched for 3 years and always fell short due to a school, park, or daycare. There is a search for daycares by address at the day care registration website.
That’s unacceptable. I pray that you are dedicated to making anyone who supports that pay consequences. That is something you can work on every day and help improve America.
Thanks for the reply. I obviously didn’t get a timely response to the above inquiry (see date), but I found the answer in the online municipal code:
Sec. 685.102 – Sexual predators residency requirements.
(a)It is unlawful for any person who is required by Florida law to register as a sexual predator to reside within 2,500 feet of any school, public library, day care center, park, playground, or other place where children regularly congregate.(b)A person residing within 2,500 feet of any school, public library, day care center, park, playground, or other place where children regularly congregate does not commit a violation of this Section, provided that the sexual predator is in full compliance with probation, parole, or conditional release and does not commit another sexual offense, and was in compliance with the residency restrictions prior to July 1, 2005, if any of the following apply:(1)The person established the permanent residence prior to July 1, 2005.(2)The person was a minor when he/she committed the offense and was not convicted as an adult.(3)The person is a minor.(4)The school, public library or day care center within 2500 feet of the persons permanent residence was opened after the person established the permanent residence.(c)A person who violates subsection (a) shall be guilty of a class D offence.
(Ord. 2005-629-E, § 3; Ord. 2010-836-E, § 4)
Note— Former § 674.502.
As you can see, the restrictions only apply to those designated as predators. Not that this is a good thing (restrictions like these are worse than worthless), but it’s worth knowing that this code doesn’t apply to all offenders.
Am l reading this right because my charge is from 1991 I live in Florida and I’m under restrictions I guess They made me move from my residence because I was three feet inside a zone and after living there for a year and a half they came and told me I had to move and we are a family of 6 so we had to pack up everything and move I spent all the money moving and didn’t get my address changed on my license in time and got violated and now I’m on House arrest from a 1991 charge.its now 2021 and I’m going through this all over again.Am I supposed to be under these restrictions because if not I’ll call a lawyer tomorrow and see if something can be done because that caused my violation and now my wife and kids live one place and I in another because of this
When did you complete all sanctions?
On the fdle access site that they print from on occasion: i also have RESIDENCY RESTRICTION: NONE
Do you have any info – I am looking for a place to live
Can you list which states allow the cities/counties to mandate their own restrictions besides Florida
We cannot – that would require exhaustive research and our focus needs to remain primarily in Florida or our core efforts will fall off the plate.
The latitude of authority granted to local governments varies by state. In some states, known as home rule states, an article or amendment to the state constitution grants cities, municipalities, and/or counties the ability to pass laws to govern themselves as they see fit (so long as they obey the state and federal constitutions). In other states, only limited authority has been granted to local governments by passage of statutes in the state legislature. In these states, a city or county must obtain permission from the state legislature if it wishes to pass a law or ordinance which is not specifically permitted under existing state legislation. You can find a quick reference of the states at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_rule_in_the_United_States, however you will still need to research each county and/or specific city to confirm if they have such ordinances. To research ordinances go to https://www.municode.com/ and select Code Library to begin.
In the State of Florida, the constitution prohibits Home rule counties from enacting any special law or general law of local application pertaining to the punishment for a crime, that power is reserve to the State. (Article III section 11(a)4) If, after judicial review, it is found the intent and purpose of 775.215 was to create a new crime and to impose a punishment , then the Counties ordinance would be violative of general law and the States constitution.
I’ll be seeking judicial review of the purpose and legislative intent next month.
Example: In the State Florida a felon who had adjudication withheld is permitted to possess a fire arm.
Dade County is prohibited by law to enact any special law that conflicts with the States: “Anyone convicted of a felony, regardless if adjudication is withheld, is prohibited to possess a fire arm within the county” Would be violative of State law.
Like that, if 775.215 is determined to be criminal not remedial the 1,000 foot restriction a punishment, then State law occupies the field.
Isn’t the purpose and legislative intent identified near the beginning of the ordinance?
What is the difference between a criminal statute and remedial?
Review s775.022 (2). And 775.215 is a “criminal statute”
794.065 was titled “unlawful place of residence” before being recodifyed 775.215 and renamed Residence Restriction.
History and original intent…
Let me answer your question more specifically, Miami Dade County Ordinance declares that it is a remedial, non-punitive ordinance. Florida Statute 775.215 makes no such assertion.
Thank you sending this out. I do have one question, if your offense was before 2004 does the residency restriction apply?
Not the STATE SORR, but municipal SORRs might. You will need to contact the County and City in which you live.
I was forced to move after living there for 18 months because they were in transition and never had an officer verify it.So I had to move out of my house my wife and kids are in one place I’m in another because of this I’m 47 now and this occurred when I was 18. Is it true that the residency restrictions didn’t apply to me because my offense was from 1991. If so they forced me to move and I didn’t get d.l address changed fast enough so now I’m violated for the first time ever since 1991.This is crazy when first got sentence it was 4 years probation.Im still going through it.
Contact [email protected]
I own my home. Its a duplex. In may of 2008 I informed that I’ll be doing repairs asking can I occupy the north unit and was told no problem. In October of 2008 I informed that I was returning to the south unit at which time I was told I could not do that because its an address change. When i said I’ll be staying in the north unit, I was warned that upon in person address verification if not in the north unit I’ll be arrested. My only option was to register as transient. So, every night for the last 12 years I spend in my car.
What about brevard county my offense was in 1991 am I under residency restrictions?
Yes Brevard’s is retroactive.
Ok thank you for the information mine was 4 years probation got violation technical one got sent to prison got out in 2001
Mississippi making Florida look soft. What the hell is that ???
12 states do not have SORR laws. I know you can’t predict these things, but I wonder which of those 12 states is most likely to implement them some time in the near future, and which is most likely never to implement them at all. Colorado maybe with the latter ? Never to implement. Then of course, there is the municipals and their own none sense that you have to look out for.
Trend has been to get rid of them, not to add them.
Very useful information FAC. Thank you. The thing with these restrictions is that while you’re looking for a state to live in decently from the one you are coming from, that state can be brewing some restrictions in the near future and implement them as soon as you move. Not to mention counties and cities with their own batch of restrictions – all of them throwing curve balls at you from unknown directions. Although, I knew a registered citizen who was from Delaware and according to him, 500 ft. was very doable with a few decent housing. That was more than 10 years ago and it seems they haven’t modified it or changed it.
By the way, Mississippi’s restrictions made me spill my coffee and laugh out loud. The most ridiculous of them all. Why don’t they just come out and say: ” cannot live anywhere in the entire state “
If you want to spill your coffee and laugh out loud ask for the map of available places you can pass through in Seminole County, Florida! Seminole has a 1000 foot proximity ordinance. You can’t even be present (let alone live) within 1000 feet of places constituting the center of an exclusion zone. It’s literally impossible to travel from one’s home to the border of the county without violating the law… unless you own a helicopter.
Wow FAC. It’s a good thing I read your response with an empty cup of coffee. That’s ridiculous and I didn’t even know this. That is the thing that worries me about traveling or passing through county to county in a state – which is why I stay put. Especially now with license plate readers. I read somewhere that they read your license plate at the border of Florida for those who come in and leave or something like that.
A helicopter ? They’ll probably send drones after it to take it down. It will not surprise me at all.