Second Amended Complaint filed in Does v. Swearingen (Ex Post Facto Plus Case)
A second amended complaint was filed in Does v. Swearingen on Friday.
As usual, Val Jonas, Todd Scher and their legal team did an exceptional job pleading on behalf of those required to register.
You can read the amended complaint here: Does v. Swearingen – Second Amended Complaint
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This shows good reason as to why we need to donate when possible. Forgive me for jumping in, but please note we have someone who is willing to match our donations up to $5,000!! till the end of December. I know most can barely give and others can….just please do what you can now so we can get those extra bucks!!!! Merry Christmas and wishing us all the best for the New Year!!
Yes – thank you for reminding everyone.
May God and His Mercy shine on us to come away with a victory. May He open the judges eyes and ears to the truth of the families being torn apart and that He knows each of our hearts.
May He guide the Lawyers for the people to know just what to do and say to restore us and our families to the freedom that has been long coming.
“For the Lord your God is He who goes with you to fight for you against your enemies, to give you the victory.”
Deuteronomy 20:4
This is so powerful. Will a judge(s) take the time to read all of this?
I think the court will read everything from both sides.
The Constitution of this State or of the United States create no “Rights” rather they protect LIBERTIES. They say “Congress shall pass no law”…, things the Government may not do and what they cannot interfere with the individual’s ability to do. The first amendment does not say the Government must provide for our free speech or religion. Government is not to interfere with it. We are at LIBERTY to act in our own way without Government interference. UNLESS by due course of the law. (Punishment).
This is an extremely important distinction. It does not say the Government is to provide and thus control in these “RIGHTS”. The Government is not to interfere in our freedom to act (or not) in these given enumerated areas as well as non-enumerated ones. ( See the 9th). We are the land of the FREE, with LIBERTY and JUSTICE for all.
Or so we are to believe.
The U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights is called that for a reason; it enumerates rights. Natural Law Theory you seem to be discussing asserts that we are born with certain rights such as freedom of speech and the right to defend ourselves.The U.S. Constitution was written to enumerate such rights and keep any government from taking them away, hence the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. Before the Equal Protection Clause , the Bill of Rights was limited to the protection of individuals from the U.S. Government. Once the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted, the U.S. Constitution was extended to provide protection from State governments. So, a better way to express it maybe “What rights does the U.S. Constitution prevent the the Federal Government and the States from taking away?”
Wow! I just finished reading the case so thank you for posting. Definitely the most powerful case i’ve read in awhile. The thousands of hours spent and the wealth of understanding regarding the entire issue, legal and otherwise, will be plain to all who read it. Well done and thank you FAC, staff and attorneys! This is so exciting!!
Every time I see a filing associated with this case, it makes my day.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.