The Florida Sheriff’s Association is happy with the Halloween initiative

According to Tampa’s WTSP News “the Florida Sheriff’s Association is happy with the Halloween initiative to keep kids safe during trick or treating and related events.”
Why are they “happy” you ask?

You need to scroll to the bottom of the page to find out the real reason they are happy. According to the article, “Hours dedicated to this operation: 774 hours”

774 hours to “check” on persons required to register on Halloween when historically there has NEVER been an uptick of sexual assaults at an average rate of $28.50/hour, means the Sheriffs just wasted $22,059 (excluding overtime) essentially going trick-or-treating for pay, when they could have been out stopping actual crime.

I’d be happy too!

 


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

21 thoughts on “The Florida Sheriff’s Association is happy with the Halloween initiative

  • November 14, 2019

    News4Jax aka News4 Fear mongering, had a news piece yesterday about how Clay county(which ironically fell on the same day as the city council meeting about new restictions on RSO’s, imagine that) spent 546 man hours checking on all registrants on Halloween (operation safe streets or some nonsense) Time and money better spent on other crimes. The whole thing makes me sick.

    Reply
    • November 14, 2019

      If people allow it, it will continue. Guaranteed.

      Reply
    • November 14, 2019

      I saw that news clip on News4Jax. In fact I posted some information on it at a different FAC article. I noted that the “big news” was that there were TWO arrests made but the sheriff’s office would not say what the arrests were for. I assume that it would have been embarrassing for the deputies to tell how petty the reason was for their arrests, and then word would have gotten out how our taxpayer money was being wasted on such trivial matters while real crime was taking place in other parts of the county.

      Reply
      • November 14, 2019

        Law enforcement most times is happy to communicate with the press. Our side often is more reluctant, or harder for the press to find. Sometimes suspects are reluctant to embarrass themselves or understand per their lawyers that they shouldn’t speak.

        So the press can get a dramatic story, one that attracts readers and as revenue, without a lot of work or expense.

        That’s how reporters in effect become law enforcements’ free PR stenographers.

        Law enforcement realizes this and takes full advantage of the situation, as it helps them maximize their budgets.

        Reply
  • November 13, 2019

    This – like 80% of ALL funds going to law enforcement is shamelessly wasted. Get rid of the corruption and actually use the money to protect the people and not just a few in this POLICE STATE!

    Reply
    • November 14, 2019

      Absolutely. I encourage all people to join groups that work hard to police the corrupt police. Work hard to shrink the resources that they have available. Work hard to ensure everything they do is more difficult than it should be.

      Just because Registries exist.

      War is compelled.

      Reply
  • November 13, 2019

    Wait here’s something else to think about. 774 hours ? Figure we have to be in at 6:00pm till what midnight at the latest. That would be about
    129 deputys doing this detail so who was left to go out on real calls

    Reply
    • November 14, 2019

      The article said it was a 3 day operation. Perhaps it wasn’t even on Halloween? And of course what they did had nothing to do with public safety. All of the people that they “checked on” had already told everyone where they lived, worked, etc. This “operation” didn’t change any of that. Did not affect anything.

      But anyway, what do you mean by “we”? Surely you are not implying that most people who are listed on the Registries (in these 18 counties that were checked) have to be at their homes on Halloween. That is not true. In fact, I would expect that most could go wherever they like on Halloween. And they should have.

      No one should allow law enforcement to visit them at their homes, work, or anywhere else. No one should ever speak to law enforcement other than when forced to by “law”, at a government location, and in writing only.

      Reply
      • November 14, 2019

        I meant no offence to anyone I am on probation and in Polk county you have to be in by 6:00 . Also while on probation you have to let the leo nazis come on your property and in your home. Lots of people on here talk about stuff that effects people that arnt on probation not thinking of the ones who are on probation still that alot of the stuff the they do “Leo’s” directy effects

        Reply
        • November 14, 2019

          You meant no offense? What did you say? I replied to “Tim”.

          Anyway, I assumed that Tim meant that he was on probation or parole. And I was pretty much saying to him what you said – do not assume that everyone is on probation or parole. And don’t assume the opposite. All of us should know very well that there is a mix and always keep that in mind. I think that most people do.

          Part of the way that these law enforcement criminals (LECs) sell these PR stunts to the clueless, gullible public is that they try to mislead them to believe that they are “monitoring” people and that people who are listed on the Registries have sensible restrictions regarding Halloween (or whatever) that actually do something useful. They WANT the public to be mislead that way. They want the public to believe their lies. They NEVER tell the public the ways that their “checks” or whatever are not effective. Never.

          For example, in all the blabbing and bragging that they did all over the country about their Halloween nonsense, not one single time in any place did I see them tell the public that most people who are Registered do not have to be at their homes on Halloween and that the LECs will have no clue where they are. IF this nonsense were ACTUALLY for public safety as they lie, then they would certainly want the public to know those details. I mean, if Registries actually mattered, those details would be critical. But they don’t tell the public. Because it isn’t for public safety. It is to make the public think they are protecting them and that they need more money.

          We all need to remember – because Registries exist, law enforcement must suffer. Their pathetic jobs must be even more pathetic.

          Reply
  • November 13, 2019

    What a waste of money and time. They need to watch the crazy drivers while their kids are out trick or treating. Let alone the ones in costume. And two kids shot on halloween….really.

    Reply
  • November 13, 2019

    Lol right?

    Reply
  • November 13, 2019

    Of course, it’s always been about money, why else must they find new ways to guarantee federal incentives for law service.

    Reply
    • November 14, 2019

      It is not just federal money of course. As they grow their “$EX offender” harassment business larger and larger, they simply need more money in their budgets to run it. To “protect children from predators”. They will ALWAYS ask the county, state, and federal governments for more money. Always. The bigger government grows, the more money they “need”.

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *