Wisconsin’s lifetime GPS monitoring challenged

This post was written by people within NARSOL and was first published at NARSOL.org.

 

NARSOL recently released copies of two expert reports filed last week in Antrim v. Carr, 19-cv-396 (Eastern District of Wisconsin).  

 

According to NARSOL, “The case challenges Wisconsin’s statutory scheme requiring that certain individuals convicted of sexual offenses be forced to wear a GPS monitoring device for life, even after they are off of any criminal supervision.”

You can read the NARSOL post here.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Wisconsin’s lifetime GPS monitoring challenged

  • January 15, 2024

    Wisconsin has to be very vigilant. Ex-attorney general, Brad Schimel, advocating lifetime registry for two convictions under one hearing (OAG-02-17), is now considering running for Wisconsin Supreme Court. The Wisconsin Supreme Court decided against Schimel’s opinion in decision 41-2023, but by that time, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections had already reached back and put over a thousand unsuspecting citizens on lifetime registry.

    Reply
  • January 15, 2024

    That is just flat wrong. Just like the lifetime registration for one-time offenders. Repeat offenders and predators need to be on lifetime registration.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *