8th Circuit affirms use of electronic video surveillance equipment in failure to register arrest.

This one is for those who think “who will know”…The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s allowance of electronic video surveillance equipment as used by law enforcement to catch someone living where he was not registered.

In United States v. STEFANYUK, the defendant was charged with failure to register (among other things). To catch him living where he wasn’t, Homeland Security installed electronic video surveillance equipment (“EVSE”) across the street from his home. Without a warrant they put up a hidden pole camera 15 feet off the ground in a public right of way facing the house. The camera operated for two weeks; it could pan, tilt, and zoom, but not see inside the house.

The Defendant tried to suppress the surveillance evidence, arguing that “warrantless long-term around-the-clock video recordings and surveillance of [his] home violated his Fourth Amendment rights.” The lower court dismissed and the appeals court affirmed.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

25 thoughts on “8th Circuit affirms use of electronic video surveillance equipment in failure to register arrest.

  • December 14, 2019

    Its a game people. And, like any other game there are winners and losers. If you don’t want to lose then play by the rules. If you start thinking that you can beat the game that is when you find yourself back behind bars crying about how Law Enforcement was being so mean and unfair. The law didn’t tell this person not to register his new address he decided not to register and that was the problem not the police.
    The problem I have with this incident is that he like so many others get into trouble by not being in compliance, thinking they can beat the system, then cry about it after, all the while making our efforts at changing public opinion about our issues that much more difficult.

    This guy needs our scorn not our sympathy. All of the efforts of FAC, of individuals involved in FAC, and of other organization are negatively affected by incidents like this. Please, if you want to call out society or law enforcement about their treatment of RP then lets first be honest with ourselves about the behavior of others who damage our cause.

    Reply
    • December 15, 2019

      Sentinel, All I can add is HALLELUJAH to your comment. I typically end up in “discussions” with fellow RP’s when I go back to the counseling program I completed a couple years ago. I go back as a “peer counselor”. Some times there’s a groan when I show up because I’m usually unsympathetic to the bitching & whining that goes on.
      My wife is used to me venting every time I see a story on the TV or read an article regarding a RP committing another offense or violating a statute or ordinance. If it’s truly an inadvertent offense I’m critical of the law but more often it’s the result of someone intentionally flaunting the rules. My anger comes from MY opinion that these idiots do noting but reinforce the social stigmas, “See, I told you we needed these laws to monitor and control these vile predators”…….. We gain 10 yards for a first down but then somebody does something stupid and it sets us back 20 yards. As RP’s we only hurt ourselves with this type of behavior.

      Reply
      • December 16, 2019

        Hmmm, I think I agree with you to some extent, but I’m not even sure. I’d need to think more deeply about it all.

        It seems the worst thing that could occur as a result of things like this is that the criminal regimes think that more laws are needed. Or that more “compliance checks” need to be done. I suppose that is the worst. What the criminal regimes should be doing is ignoring their Registries as much as possible. But I think these types of things probably do cause them to waste more resources.

        But I am happy if the general public thinks that Registry laws are ignored or that they are not effective. I think that is good. Except to the extent that their bitching & whining often emboldens the criminal legislators to try even more and more illegal “laws”. But other than that, I hope the general public thinks that Registries are just another big government failure.

        These “laws” deserve nothing but contempt and disrespect. The ONLY reason to even consider following them is to neutralize their weapon. That said, I do follow all of the laws precisely so the criminal regimes cannot attack me. But I will tell them and the general public how useless their laws are and how I legally go around them.

        I’m not going to scorn anyone who breaks Registries “laws”. Those people are heroes to me.

        Reply
    • December 15, 2019

      And it is people like you that makes it possible for the corruption to continue. This man’s rights were violated. Yes, he broke the law and yes he should go to jail, but not because law enforcement broke the law themselves to catch him in the act. How many thousands of dollars were wasted in this fiasco when they could have used that to catch REAL criminals who are a REAL threat. I have lost count how many times something like this happened while an innocent victim was harmed or killed only blocks away that could have been prevented and nine times out of ten the creep got away with it. The Constitution was written for a reason and it protects everyone, not just the people who think are obeying the law. If you really knew the law I bet you would find out you break many laws every day. Should you be hounded and spied on illegally for it? How would you feel if this happened to you or someone you love? Think before you stick your foot in your mouth.

      Reply
      • December 16, 2019

        @ D. Martinez,

        Law enforcement do not need a warrant to place video surveillance in a public setting. Even though it’s aimed at the home it’s field of view was a small step up from what anyone would see from the street.

        I do agree that the resources spent could’ve gone on to better use elsewhere. As noted earlier this is a game and you are an unwilling participant.

        Until things change for the better, play by their rules or run the risk of being caught. OR… move to a country that isn’t so silly.

        Reply
    • December 17, 2019

      I don’t know I’m with you but I’m not. I say if the rules are stupid and they make the game unfair we ALL stand against them in court and out of court. It’s a delicate situation. It’s easy to enforce the registration rule when the majority adhere and the minority don’t. It’s easy for the cops to catch one guy speeding down the highway. But if every car that drives down that road is speeding during rush hour then what? We as people gotta begin to stand up and unite as a while nationwide. I’m all for going about it through the legal system but when the rules and people who make them are against you you begin to see they modify the game to their advantage. Along with court battles we need to make some noise. The radical route would be every offender in the nation saying we aren’t registering, we aren’t putting sides in our yard, we aren’t sitting in the back of the bus any more. The passive route is through the great work that fac and other orginazations are doing. What’s the balance?

      Reply
      • December 17, 2019

        I already know FAC’s position on this: comply with the law!

        And who here will be the first to volunteer to be separated from their families and have their dirty laundry aired on the nightly news, just to make a point?

        Has a failure to register ever resulted in public support for reducing/eliminating registration? Imagine the opportunity for law enforcement, elected officials, and the news media, were there a “mass failure to register.”

        Reply
  • December 14, 2019

    This is an area of case law that must still be developing. I found this decision out of the 1st Circuit:

    U.S. v. MOORE-BUSH

    In this case, the continuous use of surveillance for 8 months, combined with other factors, enabled the government to create an intimate log of the activities of those under surveillance, and the court’s decision went in favor of the defendants.

    Reply
    • December 15, 2019

      James
      Good research, thanks

      Reply
    • December 15, 2019

      It is indeed. This site covers topics dealing with the issue on a (fairly) regular basis, if you are interested in following:

      https://www.techdirt.com/

      Reply
  • December 14, 2019

    WOW. As we fight for our rights, we continually face more. What reason did DHS “Without a warrant they put up a hidden pole camera 15 feet off the ground in a public right of way facing the house.”?

    Is this according to their mission of “The Department of Homeland Security has a vital mission: to secure the nation….” (https://www.dhs.gov/about-dhs).

    Will the nation once be secure if ALL citizens are watched 24/7? Can you say China? Can you say Police State? Wake up USA.

    “The lower court dismissed and the appeals court affirmed.” Court judges have been dismissed because they “disagree” with the public in lieu of constitutional rights…. are all public officials now scared of their jobs and willing to do so instead of defending the Constitution?

    Reply
    • December 14, 2019

      Federal judges aren’t scared of losing their jobs because they are appointed for LIFE. But all too many times, they side with prosecutors and against anyone charged with a sex offense to keep their own legacies in tact.

      Reply
  • December 14, 2019

    They had to have had some suspicion based on something, probably a neighbor made a complaint or an officer noticed every time “he” went to visit or serve papers the guy was never home.

    Reply
    • December 14, 2019

      He was being investigated for CP.

      Reply
  • December 14, 2019

    Big brother is watching you. Beware . That’s what comes with being a red letter marked outcast from society.

    Reply
    • December 14, 2019

      Why don’t they install cameras across the street from convicted drug dealers???
      Oh….what was I thinking? My bad!!!!!
      That would cause the police too much work arresting re-offenders and the courts and prosecutors would be much more weighed down than what they already are.
      I guess you have to select what is the most viable in the public eyes of making them believe you are doing the most good even when it isn’t.

      Reply
    • December 14, 2019

      Big Brother indeed! He has been here for a long time. I am afraid that this country is lost and there is no way back from the police/surveillance state. The Dept of Homeland Defense is really nothing more than a modern day SS. Taken to its logical extent, we all will be personally watched 24/7 and will have to “answer” for anything we do that is not dictated by this bloated, out of control, and arrogant government. Time to wake up people! I helped get the Vietnam war stopped. Its time to organize and stop this BULLSHIT! There are approx ONE MILLION people on the S.O. registry. That is a powerful number! Lets get after it folks!

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *