ACTION NEEDED: U.S. marshals arrest 9 convicted sex offenders in ‘Operation Dunder Mifflin’

The story about the U. S. Marshals finding 13 people not living at their registered addresses in Scranton, PA, has been running for several days in Pennsylvania, but I am shocked that the Tampa Bay Times would give up space for something as nonsensical as this story is and miles away from Florida.  As always, no new sex crimes were committed.  If this is big news down in Florida, then newspapers do not know what real news is anymore.

In Scranton, an individual on the registry cannot live with 2500 feet of any school, child-care facility, open space, community center, public park or recreational facility in the city.  Where are these people supposed to live?

FAC is sending a Letter to the Editor of the Tampa Bay Times concerning this absurdity.

There does not appear to be a comment section, but Letters to the Editor (up to 250 words) can be sent to:  https://www.tampabay.com/opinion/submit-letter/

It would be good if the Tampa Bay Times could hear from many different people.  Even if they do not publish our letters, maybe they will think twice before wasting space on something that is not newsworthy.

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

11 thoughts on “ACTION NEEDED: U.S. marshals arrest 9 convicted sex offenders in ‘Operation Dunder Mifflin’

  • October 12, 2021

    I emailed this to [email protected]:

    “Hello,

    Your paper published an article, mentioning that 9 sex offenders were arrested. Here is an excerpt:

    “Of those, 13 were found in violation of sex-offender-registration laws. Nine of them were taken into custody while authorities on Saturday were still searching for the other four, all of them men.”

    I am trying to understand this:

    Why does your paper feel that this is ‘relevant information’ except to scare-monger your audience, despite your About Us section claiming to have ‘no agenda’?

    What important Crimes were committed that your readers needed to be made so aware of here?

    There is a MOUNTAIN of evidence coming out now that the entire registry serves Zero purpose to lower recidivism rates. Do you have any Real Journalists in your group that like to report important information relevant to your audience such as this?

    I will be awaiting a reply from your editor.”

    Reply
    • October 13, 2021

      Thank you for contacting them, Joe123. Good idea to use [email protected]. I will save this contact info.

      Reply
    • October 13, 2021

      Unfortunately reality no longer matters to the “woke” – just want to feel good masses.

      We live in a country where mass delusions are more important than facts and it is only getting worse with each passing day.

      Reply
  • October 11, 2021

    If a ‘Person Forced to Register’ was convicted under State Charges and NOT Federal Charges, How can a Federal Agency, US Marshals, Enforce Compliance Checks; Should Not Only State Law Enforcement Agencies enforce these Draconian Compliance Checks?

    I am confused…If anyone could shed some light on this, it would be appreciated!

    Thanks

    Reply
    • October 12, 2021

      The state receives Federal Justice Assistance Grants for remaining in compliance with Federal standards such as address checks.

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *