CA: Disappointing loss in ACSOL case to block in person registration

Yesterday, a judge denied the temporary restraining order sought by the Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws to prevent Los Angeles County from requiring in-person visits to sheriff’s department stations during a pandemic.

More information on the hearing can be found on the Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws website.

The disappointing result of the hearing is just more proof that registration laws are punitive. A law that requires a person to put their health and safety in jeopardy to comply, cannot be said to be not punishment.

We know, however, this is not the end of the road with this battle.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

14 thoughts on “CA: Disappointing loss in ACSOL case to block in person registration

  • April 25, 2020

    This might be a temporary loss, but Janice Bellucci’s work for the greater good of all is continuing to move forward as she is taking down one county after another in California over their residency restrictions. How do we get that here in Florida?

    http://www.hidesertstar.com/news/article_2b25c6c2-868b-11ea-b4e4-3734f8ac86c6.html

    There appears to be no way to comment about the futility of residency restrictions without opening up an account with this media site.

    Reply
    • April 25, 2020

      If we could fully fund our two legal challenges outstanding, then our awesome Legal Committee could brainstorm with the attorneys, which challenge(s) should come next (ie, where else is the state or counties most legally vulnerable and causing the most harm).

      Reply
      • April 25, 2020

        Yes. I had an attorney tell me that most of the smaller county ordinances are weak and would be easy to take down. Miami/Dade, Gainesvile, and other larger municipalities would be a little more challenging.

        Reply
        • April 26, 2020

          We could start with counties where a victory would establish good precedent. And where enough sympathetic plaintiffs will participate.

          Interesting what that attorney (I can guess which one) said and illustrates why Miami-Dade SORR has been dragging along so long.

          Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *