Canada: Sex-offender provision unconstitutional in not criminally responsible cases

The Supreme Court of Canada has affirmed that Ontario’s sex-offender registry regime violates the constitutional rights of people found not criminally responsible for their actions by reason of mental disorder. [NOTE: THEIR REGISTRY IS NON-PUBLIC]

In Ontario, the law requires those who are either convicted of a sexual offence or found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder to report to a police station to have their personal information added to the registry. There is opportunity, on a case-by-case basis, for those found guilty of sexual offences to be removed or even exempted from the registry. However, someone found not criminally responsible for a sexual offence lacks the same avenues to be removed from the registry or exempted from reporting, even after receiving an absolute discharge from a review board.

In writing for a majority of the court, Justice Andromache Karakatsanis said the provincial regime draws discriminatory distinctions between people found guilty and people found not criminally responsible for sexual offences on the basis of mental disability. “These discriminatory distinctions cannot be justified in a free and democratic society.”

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “Canada: Sex-offender provision unconstitutional in not criminally responsible cases

  • November 21, 2020

    FAC
    Yes I realize that but in essence they are admitting that they realize it’s purpose is not safety but punishment. For punishment has no effect on someone that can’t understand that their behavior is unacceptable.

    Reply
  • November 20, 2020

    So in other words,if you’re crazy you don’t go on a registry list , if you’re sane , you go on a registry. That right there shows the registry has absolutely nothing to do with protecting anyone or anything. It’s plain and simple punishment and public shaming and an effort at public humiliation.

    Reply
    • November 20, 2020

      It’s not public

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *