Colorado considers keeping some juvenile sex offenders off registry

Colorado lawmakers advanced a proposal this week to place fewer youths who commit sexual offenses on the state registry, and to partially seal that registry from the public.

The proposed changes are informed by research showing that harshly penalizing juvenile sex offenders often does nothing to improve public safety or rehabilitate the offenders.

The proposed bill was endorsed Thursday by four of five voting members of an interim committee of state lawmakers convened to consider changes to how Colorado criminal and juvenile justice systems treat people with mental illness. The committee comprises members from both parties and both chambers of the legislature.

The draft that committee members voted to introduce next year expands significantly the discretion of judges not to require juveniles to register as sex offenders. It also allows people adjudicated — a synonym for “convicted” used in juvenile cases — for multiple sex offenses to petition to deregister, and for “lookbacks” by courts that may want to remove someone from the registry, or add someone, depending on new information that may surface.

As of April 2017, there were more than 2,000 people on the sex offender registry list in Colorado who were required to register as a result of an offense they committed as minors, according to Colorado Bureau of Investigation data. The entire registry, including people convicted as adults, has nearly 20,000 people on it.

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “Colorado considers keeping some juvenile sex offenders off registry

  • October 23, 2019

    According to The Washington Times, possibly some good news for juveniles out of Louisiana: The Louisiana’s Supreme Court has sidestepped, for now, the question of whether juveniles convicted of sex crimes can be required to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives, but the majority said the requirement is unconstitutional and should be changed by lawmakers.

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/23/court-sidesteps-issue-on-juvenile-sex-offenders/

    Do copyright laws allow us to copy links for news articles to other websites?

    Reply
    • October 23, 2019

      I’ve never heard of a link violating copyright. Quite the opposite, where a link takes the reader directly to the copyrighted source.

      Reply
      • October 24, 2019

        Smart thinking

        Reply
  • October 15, 2019

    Meanwhile Florida is double talking out the sides of there mouth. Note their own admission of the punitiveness of theses registries.

    The Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s application for that money, which The Appeal obtained through a public-records request, uses the size of the registry to sell the state as a leader in punitiveness. In one section, the agency touts the more than 700 percent growth in the number of people on its registry since its inception in 1997 and its continuing expansion. “Florida currently has one of the largest registries in the country and enjoys national recognition as a leader and model in the strength of sexual predator and offender laws,” the agency notes.

    Reply
  • October 14, 2019

    It was amusing when I the line: “…research showing that harshly penalizing juvenile sex offenders often does nothing to improve public safety or rehabilitate the offenders.” How the hell does it improve public safety or rehabilitation of adult sex offenders??? Apparently they are alleging otherwise!

    Reply
    • October 14, 2019

      WOW David I was just going to type the same thing almost word for word even starting off with “How the Hell……..” LOL You took the words right out of my mouth and probably most who read this on F.A.C
      Huge double standards by whoever made the statements that it is bad for young people but fine to ruin adults lives.

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *