Court challenge to juvenile sex offender registration laws fails

Juveniles who are convicted of a sex crime in California and are sentenced to state custody can be required to register with police as sex offenders for life, a state appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty and mandatory life sentencing laws cannot be applied to juveniles because of their lesser mental and emotional development. But the Third District Court of Appeal in Sacramento said the same rationale does not apply to state sex offender registration laws, which are meant to protect the public rather than to punish the offender.

The laws are “intended to assist law enforcement to maintain surveillance of (repeat) sex offenders, and have no purpose to punish for past misconduct,” the court said, quoting a 2004 California Supreme Court decision in an adult registration case.

 The case involved a Sacramento County youth, identified as J.C., who was placed in foster homes after being abused as a child. At age 12, the court said, he sodomized a 5-year-old boy. He was then placed on probation, was returned to his mother’s custody and was enrolled in a sex offender treatment program.

Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “Court challenge to juvenile sex offender registration laws fails

  • August 3, 2017

    And I’m not quite sure how ostracizing people and taking away all their rights somehow “makes the public safer”…. Since no other crime seems to have a registry I guess they are different somehow?

    Reply
  • August 3, 2017

    Whatever the intent, punishment is still punishment. Let some of these judges try it out for a while and they will surely change their minds. Living in a field with no job and no home sounds like punishment to me.

    Reply
  • August 3, 2017

    Just one more reason California’s state motto should be:
    ” THE LAND OF FRUITS AND NUTS”.

    Reply
  • August 3, 2017

    So only if said juvenile is a “repeat” offender….? That’s what I got out of it.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *