An Indiana win!  Hartford City, IN (population around 6,000) has an ordinance which sets up banishment zones for registrants, areas where individuals on the sex offense registry may not spend time or even pass through under threat of prosecution.  For waiting, across the street, to pick up his daughter from school, a father was cited under the ordinance.  In  2015 the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Indiana filed a class action challenge to the law in federal court.  Now a judge has put a crimp in the city’s plans, holding the law is unconstitutionally vague and violates ex post facto principles.  The Indiana Lawyer blog has the details.  For the skinny on this seriously pernicious law, have a look at Rebecca S. Green’s excellent, detailed Fort Wayne Gazette article which includes surprising quotes from a member of law enforcement—critical of the registry and related measures.  A link to the federal court’s opinion is also below.  Congratulations to Brian Valenti and others who will benefit, hopefully soon, from this decision.  And kudos to ACLU of Indiana, legal eagle Ken Falk and all those who worked on this case. –Bill Dobbs

 

Indiana Lawyer | Dec. 2, 2016

Hartford City sex offender ordinance unconstitutionally vague

Excerpts:   Judge Theresa Springmann in the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, granted Valenti summary judgment in part, finding the ordinance violates Indiana’s ex post facto law as applied to Valenti, and that it’s unconstitutionally vague.

The Hartford City ordinance, which was amended in 2015, imposed a fine of up to $200 per offense for registered sex offenders who entered or loitered within 300 feet of parks, schools, public libraries, arcades, amusement centers, swimming pools, child care facilities, athletic complexes, crisis centers or shelters, skate parks or rinks, movie theaters, bowling alleys, scouting facilities or the office of protective services. MORE:

http://www.theindianalawyer.com/hartford-city-sex-offender-ordinance-unconstitutionally-vague/PARAMS/article/42182

 

The Journal Gazette [Fort Wayne, IN] | March 15, 2015

Sex offender fights restraint law; Challenges Hartford City child safety zones

By Rebecca S. Green

On Jan. 23, a Hartford City police officer ticketed Valenti as he waited in his brother’s car across the street from a school, waiting to pick up his child.

Convicted sex offender Brian Valenti would like to take his daughter bowling. And to church. Valenti wants those freedoms back and, alongside the ACLU of Indiana, is fighting the small Blackford County city, according to a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Fort Wayne.

In his lawsuit, Valenti claims the ordinance is vague, arbitrary, and irrational, and in violation of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to U.S. Constitution.

Because he is unable to attend church, under the advice of law enforcement because of the law, Valenti also alleges the ordinance violates his rights to freely practice his religion.  And when he tries to vote in person in an election, he is prohibited from doing that as well, as his polling place is located inside an elementary school. That, Valenti, said is a violation of another constitutional right.  MORE:

http://www.journalgazette.net/news/local/courts/Sex-offender-fights-restraint-law-5534918

 

Valenti v. Hartford

US District Court for Northern Indiana, case no. 1:15-cv-63

Opinion and order Dec. 1, 2016:

http://media.ibj.com/Lawyer/websites/opinions/index.php?pdf=2016/december/hartford-city.pdf

 

 

Share This

Let's Spread Truth

Share this post!