Ex Post Facto Plus Case Dismissed
Devastating news in from the Southern District of Florida. Does v. Swearingen (the case we referred to as “Ex Post Facto Plus”) has been dismissed by Judge Kathleen Williams because the plaintiffs are barred by the statute of limitations.
A copy of the order follows.
Does v Swearingen – Final Judgment
We will update as soon as we hear more from the attorneys.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
any sneaky excuse to avoid making an honest ruling.Been telling you from day one you can not trust the legal system. Nothing legal about the legal system. typical court corruption. This type of corruption in the legal system is exactly why I don’t shed a tear when cops and lawyers are getting targeted and shot. When judges start facing the consequences for their corruption as well and start getting shot i doubt many people will have sympathy for them as well. It is sad I can see where chaos leads but at the same time, maybe we need a little chaos to restore law and order in the words law and order.
No one is going to get shot. Cmon now.
The last thing we need is more chaos and acts of violence, especially since one of our principal arguments is that we are nonviolent.
The fact it was dismissed with prejudice, is a clear sign that the court has noted that this is a clear problem, for which will not cease to bring up future lawsuits.
Very disappointed, was hoping this would stop all the unnecessary hassle, and be able to live Free again, without Restrictions….
Hope they can refile before time runs out….
I understand that it’s a tough loss and seems deflating but let’s keep our chins up. All work is good work and lessons learned. I’ll be donating as much as I can now and again in Jan.
Has the money for the lawsuit been used up?
It has not – it’s not the end of the road.
Yes. The decision was not based on the merits, but on a rather narrow technical issue.
Veritas.
If it has been filed as a Class Action case it would have involved all registrants, including those her are not time barred. If I am wrong please feel free to correct me. And you are correct, this is not the end.
f***
There is an old saying that goes: “You can’t fight city hall.” This appears to be the case here because the courts look for any reason to dismiss our claims in support if the various government entities we all have to fight regularly. This judge even fired a warning shot towards us in regards to our claims even if they were not deemed time barred. This judge clearly doesn’t want a similar case thst is not time barred to come to court.