FAC keeps pushing for answers after FDLE fails to clarify “Internet Identifier” requirements.

We want to update you on an important development regarding our ongoing efforts to get clear answers on Florida’s “internet identifier” reporting requirements.

As you know, FAC submitted a Request for Declaratory Statement to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement under Florida Statutes Section 120.565(1). We asked what should be very straightforward questions: what types of accounts actually need to be reported under Florida Statutes Section 943.0435, who decides whether something qualifies, and whether there is any written guidance that people can rely on. We initiated this action after members were getting violated in some counties for not registering their Google Drive account, YouTube (which does not offer direct person-to-person communication) or similar accounts. We asked other registration offices and sheriffs whether certain accounts were required to be registered and got differing answers. Some had no clue.

On March 11, 2026, FDLE issued a denial — but instead of answering those questions, they totally avoided them. We have now formally appealed that decision.

This matters because the statute applies to all individuals required to register and our members are directly affected. If someone gets it wrong, they can be arrested. That makes clarity not just helpful, but absolutely necessary. FDLE suggested that we were trying to determine the conduct of third parties. That’s simply not true. We’re asking for guidance for our own members — people who are required to follow this law and need to understand what is expected of them so they don’t unintentionally violate it. They also refused to answer the most basic question: who actually decides whether a specific website or app must be reported? Think about it — if you’re unsure whether your comment on our website or your employer’s cloud storage account needs to be registered, who do you ask? And if law enforcement sees online activity that may not have been reported, who decides whether that’s a violation? Is it an individual officer? A local sheriff? FDLE? Right now, there’s no clear answer.

On top of that, FDLE declined to say whether they even have any written policies or internal guidance on this issue. If such guidance exists, people should be able to rely on it. If it doesn’t, that raises even more serious concerns about how this law is being enforced across the state.

At the end of the day, all we are asking for is clarity. When a law carries severe criminal penalties with mandatory minimum sentences, people need to know what is required of them — and law enforcement needs a consistent standard to follow.

We’ll keep you updated as this moves forward. In the meantime, to read our appeal, click on the link below.

FAC Appeal to FDLE – Dec Stmt 04212026


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

24 thoughts on “FAC keeps pushing for answers after FDLE fails to clarify “Internet Identifier” requirements.

  • April 21, 2026

    The whole issue bares down on the enforcement of unconstitutional laws that are both ex post facto and vague. They do not want to answer because that allows them to make up their own, what is and what is not. IE: Youtube, Google Drive, Ebay. There should be a list that says if you have anything on this list it needs to be reported if not then you do not. It is pretty simple.

    Reply
    • April 22, 2026

      Tearfuleagle

      Ebay should NOT be registrable because it is a site to sell items, not to make friends, or socialize. Only one way to contact a buyer/seller and that is through the messaging area on ebay. It is controlled by ebay what you can say on the message such as “Hey Brian, I am letting you know I shipped your makeup kit today”. LOL

      Reply
  • April 21, 2026

    I understand that they want cloud based picture sites, and apps, but Google Drive is part of your regular Google account. Shouldn’t need a separate registration for it.

    Reply
    • April 21, 2026

      “Cloud based picture sites”? I don’t recall those mentioned anywhere in the registration law.

      Unless you are referring to something like Instagram, where users can post personal profiles and contact other users who have also posted profiles.

      Reply
      • April 22, 2026

        There are some Counties that require a separate registration entry for google drive. If you don’t register it there they will arrest you. That is what is meant by cloud based picture sites.

        Reply
      • April 22, 2026

        Jacob

        I do not have any social media at all. The only thing that is even close is FAC itself. I have never heard of anyone registering Florida action committee as social media, but what do I know right? There is a possibility with all these stupid requirements that every one of us has un-knowingly violated some trivial crap that really has NOTHING to do with the registry or offending.
        It is like telling an ex-murderer one of their stipulations is you cannot go anywhere near Burger king.

        Reply
        • April 22, 2026

          Or at least it used to be.

          Reply
      • April 22, 2026

        They don’t quite go into detail on the registration paperwork, but if you look into the statutes, it’s there Jacob.

        Reply
  • April 21, 2026

    This is just more evidence of government obfuscation. It seems there is no accountability at the state and federal levels anymore, if there ever was.

    Reply
  • April 21, 2026

    You mentioned having members arrested for violating this law. I hope you can forward all this effort to their defense counsel, though ideally not a public defender.

    Reply
  • April 21, 2026

    Your work is invaluable. Thank you so much.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *