FAC Weekly Update 2025-11-04-Halloween Truth vs Myth
Weekly update for November 4, 2025. This is recording number 336.
Dear Members and Advocates,
We made it! Another Halloween has come and gone, and—just like every other year—the dire warnings, police sweeps, and media hysteria amounted to absolutely nothing. Each November, we at FAC comb through the headlines and police blotters, searching for the supposed “uptick” in sexual crimes that nearly every media outlet alludes to before Halloween. And each November 1st, we come up empty.
Year after year, law enforcement agencies issue ominous Halloween warnings to parents to “check the registry.” Every year, municipalities try to outdo each other with curfews, door signs, “Operation” details, re-publication of our pictures, and other performative measures meant to make people feel safe. And every year, the results are exactly the same: nothing happens! Of course, the architects of these ridiculous policies will pat themselves on the back and say, “See? It worked!” But that’s nonsense. Study after study has shown there is no increase in sexual offenses on Halloween, and no difference in sex crime rates between towns that impose “Halloween restrictions” and those that don’t. Municipalities that didn’t require registrants to post warning signs were no more dangerous than those that did. And if you look back through history—even before sex offender registries existed—Halloween was no less safe for children than it is today.
Like razor blades in apples or candy tampering, this hysteria is a myth. An urban legend. Sociologist Joel Best actually did a study to debunk the myth. He collected data from 30 years of Halloweens and found only 90 instances of candy tampering, none of which were actually attempts to harm children. Instead, they were attempts by adults to sue and get a payday (not the candy bar) or kids to get attention.
But the perpetuation of these myths, including the sex offender myth, is not harmless. It distracts parents from the actual risk to children on Halloween, such as getting killed by cars. In the US, children aged 4-8 are ten times as likely to be killed by a car on Halloween than on any other day of the year. Then there’s another cost of perpetuating the sex offender Halloween myth. All these multi-agency operations around Halloween cost a boatload of money. While the federal government is struggling through yet another shutdown, claiming it doesn’t have the resources to keep air traffic controllers paid or public programs funded, somehow, there’s always enough money to fund these dog and pony shows. So instead of the US Marshalls and other agencies assisting local police to patrol the roads or finding the funds to keep our air traffic controllers working, law enforcement task forces show up en masse at our homes to harass tens of thousands of people who pose no threat, in order to solve a problem that doesn’t exist.
The myth is harmful in other ways. By focusing attention and resources on those who have already been punished and monitored, the system diverts energy from true prevention: education, family support, and early intervention. The myth of “stranger danger” not only fails to protect children but actually leaves them more vulnerable by keeping communities ignorant of where the real risks lie. It is also economically destructive and counterproductive. It keeps thousands of people trapped in poverty by restricting housing and employment opportunities, often for life. These restrictions make it nearly impossible for registrants to achieve self-sufficiency or stability — both key factors in reducing recidivism. The constant threat of arrest for minor technical violations, coupled with financial penalties and surveillance costs, drains public resources and destabilizes families. The registry ensures dependency, homelessness, and hopelessness — all at the taxpayer’s expense and only serving to provide a false sense of security.
So congratulations, everyone—we survived another Halloween. No registrants snatched up any trick-or-treaters, nobody on the list arrested for lewd acts with a pumpkin, and once again, reality refused to cooperate with fearmongering. Maybe next year, instead of wasting millions on theatrics, our lawmakers can invest in something that actually improves public safety? Or maybe that’s just wishful thinking. For us at FAC, at least we don’t need to come up with a new topic for our weekly update and can instead recycle the same one year after year and allow our members to share it with their lawmakers. The message, of course, being “I told you so…”
Until then, enjoy the peace and quiet that follows yet another uneventful Halloween—brought to you not by the registry, but by the facts.
Sincerely,
The Florida Action Committee
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

You are just banging your head against the wall and screaming into the empty wind.. There is are much more rational litmus test to be performing and a much more critical questions to ask..
1) If registrys really worked, if they ever really thought they worked for the “intended purpose” and if they were even remotely legal why allow such an effective and useful tool go to waste? It should be the golden standard by which all crime is prevented! Drug dealer registrys, Murder registrys, Drunk driver registrys, Arson registrys, Burglary registrys, Assault registrys.. Registrys for every crime should all be the rage and we should be living in a crime free eutopia similar to the Time Cop saga…. 2) Law enforcement, justice departments, Supreme courts, Executive and legislation, media, nobody is screaming for these things when they should be such an obvious solution to every crime and every harm imaginable!
3) There Is the litmus and that is what raises the question.. So what exactly is the registry for and why defend it so arduously? Answer that and you solve everything.. (spoiler alert) There never was a belief the registry worked as a crime deterrent or preventive. It’s much more sinister then that I believe you will find.
There are other registries out there based upon the SO registry model. Ohio has a DUI registry for example. Other states have DV, animal abuse, arson, kidnapping, etc where some of those crimes are lumped onto the SO registry.
Make sure you guys read about internet identifiers they are their new stick. And the ones who enforce the law do know know how to decifer it.