FAC Weekly Update: The Ripple Effect of a Constitutional Challenge | September 15, 2026 | Recording 390
FLORIDA ACTION COMMITTEE
Weekly Update – September 15, 2026
Recording No. 390
Help Make Florida the Next Ripple
Dear Members and Advocates,
One of the most important things about a major constitutional lawsuit is that its impact can extend far beyond the original case. We saw a perfect example of that this past week in Michigan.
The Ripple Effect in Michigan
On September 9, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a short but extraordinarily important order in People v. Eddie Lee Smith. Smith was not a plaintiff in the groundbreaking litigation brought by the ACLU of Michigan challenging Michigan’s registry. His case was his own separate criminal case. But his victory was a direct product of that litigation and the legal foundation it established.
Michigan had already determined that its Sex Offender Registration Act was punishment. Once that was established, the next question was obvious: If the registry is punishment, can the government impose that punishment retroactively on people whose crimes occurred before the law was enacted? In Smith, the answer was no.
Smith committed the crimes for which he was required to register in 1995 and 2010. Nevertheless, Michigan was requiring him to register under the 2011 version of SORA and then criminally prosecuted him for not doing so. The Michigan Supreme Court held that the statutory requirements enacted after his crimes constituted punishment and that applying those requirements to Smith therefore violated the Ex Post Facto Clauses of both the United States and Michigan Constitutions.
Technically, Smith was an individual case. But the implications were much bigger. Michigan has apparently finally recognized that it would be rather difficult to keep tens of thousands of people subject to a law that had already been determined could not constitutionally be applied to them (and continue to charge them with violations). The Michigan State Police announced Friday that it had already removed more than 20,000 people from the registry as of September 11, with the review and removal process continuing. That’s the ripple effect. The ACLU’s lawsuit established constitutional principles that helped Smith beat his failure to register case.
What This Could Mean for Florida
That is hopefully what we will see in Florida Action Committee v. Glass also. If we succeed, the consequences could reach far beyond the current case, and that possibility is particularly important right now for the hundreds of people who are facing criminal registration-violation charges. Florida has conducted numerous registration-enforcement crackdowns over the past six months, resulting in a bunch of people being charged with technical registration violations. Some of those prosecutions involve registration requirements that are being challenged in FAC v. Glass. If a registration requirement is ultimately determined to be unconstitutional, that could become highly relevant in cases where someone is being prosecuted for violating that very requirement.
Facing a Registration-Violation Prosecution?
If you are currently facing a registration-violation prosecution, make sure your criminal defense attorney knows about FAC v. Glass. Your attorney (not FAC) should be able to evaluate whether the constitutional issues being litigated in our case have any potential bearing on your particular charges or defenses.
This is not a suggestion that every pending prosecution will be affected by our lawsuit. It is just a reminder that constitutional litigation can change the legal landscape — and defense attorneys need to know when that landscape may be changing.
Please Email an Attorney
Please take a moment to email your criminal defense attorney (or the attorney who represented you in the past) and make sure they know about FAC v. Glass. You don’t have to be facing a registration violation yourself. There is a very good chance that your former attorney has another client who is and we’re all in this together. Let them know that Florida’s registry is being challenged and point them toward the case. The more Florida criminal defense attorneys who understand what we are doing, the more likely it is that these issues will be raised when they matter.
Please help us make Florida the next ripple.
Sincerely,
The Florida Action Committee
Support Our General Legal Fund
Donate to the General Legal Fund
PLEASE DONATE TO OUR ‘GENERAL LEGAL FUND’ TO SUPPORT OUR FORTHCOMING CHALLENGE TO THE REGISTRY.
For tax-deductible donations, contact
[email protected].
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
A short time ago I posted my concerns about presenting drivers at front desk at hospital, doctors office and psychiatric therapy.
Their attention became minimal and distant and one doctor gave me a quick explanation and left me sitting, I had to show myself out. A year ago I was diagnosed with cancer, I’ve been with an Oncologist and Urologist who know my designation along with their staff. They treated me like professionals but that’s tainted by their personal feelings. I often wonder, would I be safe as a patient in the hospital.
The registry has become a weapon. Yes, you read that correctly. A WEAPON used by law enforcement to promote fruitless public safety propaganda. A weapon to facilite hate and intimidation with names like “Operation End Game” and “Operation Roundup.” A weapon used by politicians in attack and smear ads against their opponents. A weapon used by vigilantes to achieve their goals at their discretion. A weapon for scammers to use for an easy way to conduct and profit from fradulent schemes. A weapon for employers to use to deny employment. A weapon for strangers you haven’t met to form a preconceived negative opinion about you. A weapon for you neighbors to shame, shun and snub you with.
The registry is not a public safety utility or tool, it’s a LEGISLATIVE REVENGE WEAPON.
How do you like that ripple?
I remember in April, 2022 after I had a triple coronary bypass and aortic valve replacement at an Osceola Hospital, I was recovering from the open chest surgery and was offered an outside cardiac rehabilitation program by some health providers. One day, a female doctor at the hospital called me and told me that those outside providers refused to accept me because I was in the Registry (for a non contact sex offense dating back more than ten years). In the end, after I was discharged from the hospital, a more understanding provider agreed to send a health professional to my home to provide those services. Can you believe that?. In one of the most needy situations of your life, as it is with a much needed medical service to your health, the hysteria pervading the Registry rules in Florida could interfere with the provision of such a vital service?.
Emil
I am very sorry that happened to you, however you are not alone. The very same thing happened to me at a hospital in Florida. I had, had a heart attack and the EMT’s rolled me in on a stretcher. They were told by a nurse to park me along a wall and they would attend to me. 4 hours later the same EMT’s came in with another patient and they stopped to ask if I had been laying there for the entire 4 hours.
I stated that not a single person had checked on me and I couldn’t believe this but the EMT walked to the nurse’s office and I could hear him chewing them out and how unprofessional they were. It took almost 10 hours for a doctor to see me. By then the heart attack had stopped and they sent me home with a note to see a cardiologist. And for nothing but just sitting around for 10 hours, I received a bill from the hospital for $2,300.00. Insurance paid part of it but they did not even do anything for me and my part of it was over $1000.00, I got sent to collections.
So we are fellows in the same disgrace, friend. I cannot understand (and no one else, for sure, unless they are part of the witch hunt cohort) how they left you unattended in an emergency room of a hospital given the fact the you were suffering a heart attack, one of the most urgent, life or death medical situations anyone can be into. In that case you were vey lucky to survive and recover later. I would have placed a gross medical negligence lawsuit against the hospital. There are legal limits to what can be done to a citizen in the name of the Registry. I only hope that this time they will have to answer largely in the federal courts for the abusive and above all, unconstitutional harm they have being doing to us after we fulfilled the legal sentences imposed by the courts long time ago. Good luck friend and may God help us all and specially FAC in this noble and just endeavour!
That should be shown to the court for proof of punishment!
Yes, the sex offender registry needs to go. Period end of story. Florida it is Punishment, I live in polk county and it’s 1500 feet not the 1000 feet standard. That alone should make it Illegal.
When I was first put on the registry in 1997 after my case adjourned there were only three requirements to adhere to. Today, there are over 60 at the state level and many hundreds more at the municipal level all across the state and beyond. On top of all that, I HAVE NEVER BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME! I have “adjudication of guilt withheld”, never went to prison, successfully completed probation in 2002 with zero violations and have maintained a perfect track ever since. And here we are, over 29 years later and the STATE CONTINUES TO PUNISH ME AND MY FAMILY WITH MORE LAWS AND PUNISHMENTS…. FOREVER! These endless unconstitutional laws MUST END!! Thank you FAC for standing up for the United States Constitution and the rule of law!