Federal funds to “fight sex trafficking” are actually perpetuating it.

REASON.COM: The program raked in $1.5 million from the Department of Justice (DOJ) in its first year. Its mission: to disrupt human trafficking and help the crime’s victims in southeastern Arizona. Instead, Southern Arizona’s Anti-Trafficking Unified Response Network (SAATURN) largely engaged in arresting and prosecuting sex workers, including some suspected of being victims of sexual exploitation.

We know this thanks to some solid investigative work from Tucson Weekly. Last week’s cover story by Danyelle Khmara reports that in three years of SAATURN investigations, 516 cases were opened. But only 23 of these cases resulted in arrests related to sex trafficking, with just 14 leading to charges and only 10 so far ending in convictions or guilty pleas. (Three of the cases are still ongoing, while one suspect committed suicide while out on bail.)

Even in these cases, “sex trafficking” is used to describe a rather wide range of conduct, including things that may have caused harm but aren’t at all what people think when they hear human trafficking and sex traffickers.

READ MORE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Federal funds to “fight sex trafficking” are actually perpetuating it.

  • December 12, 2018

    Wow. Who’d have ever thunk the federal government would dump a ton of money into something that accomplishes absolutely nothing toward its stated purpose? [/sarc]

    Reply
  • December 11, 2018

    anyone who expects the government to solve more problems then they create is a part of the problem themselves.. government is and always will be the most expensive,redundant,ineffective tool to solve anything. if you want something done corrupt and wrong count on the government to do it.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *