Great case: No duty to register if not “released from the sanction for conviction”

An excellent case came out of Florida’s 2nd District Court of Appeals last week!

An individual who had been charged with a Failure to Register (FTR) had his charges thrown out by the Trial Court (and the Appeals court now agreed) because the statutory language of 943.0435 did not require he register.

You must read the order to get a full appreciation of the magnitude of this decision: Florida v. James

According to the language of the statute, one must be convicted of one of the enumerated crimes and (II) Has been released on or after October 1, 1997, from the sanction imposed for any conviction of an offense described in sub-sub-subparagraph (I). For purposes of sub-sub-subparagraph (I), a sanction imposed in this state or in any other jurisdiction includes, but is not limited to, a fine, probation, community control, parole, conditional release, control release, or incarceration in a state prison, federal prison, private correctional facility, or local detention facility.

James didn’t register, but argued that he wasn’t required to because he had not yet been released from the sanction imposed by his conviction – he still owed money.

This case is potentially ground-breaking for those who are still under sanction for their conviction.

More to come…


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

71 thoughts on “Great case: No duty to register if not “released from the sanction for conviction”

  • April 19, 2020

    let’s really start getting anal about it all

    Reply
  • April 19, 2020

    what if u were “terminated unsuccessfully” because of the fact u didn’t complete SO counseling?? Huh? how bout that?

    Reply
  • April 18, 2020

    how many people were supposed to complete SO Counseling as part of their sentence but as we all know that money grabbing scam never ends and when probation ends that is never brought up but it was still part of your sentence or probation orders so technically i think you’re still under sanctions or did not completely pay fine n costs or had them put on you as a lien

    so this ruling is the holy grail that will turn into sess pool

    Reply
  • April 18, 2020

    So it’s additional punishment then. After your released you gotta go do this the rest of your life. Stupid me I paid all my crap off thinking I’d get restoration of civil rights from Scott so trying to find an angle in…

    Reply
  • April 18, 2020

    Dear FAC,

    Will the lawyers in Doe v. Swearingen be arguing this for us in the near furture?

    Reply
  • April 18, 2020

    Another point that comes to mind is if the duty to register is in someone’s court papers isn’t that a sanction?

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *