IN: Man shows no remorse for fatally shooting registered sex offender

A man in Indiana told deputies he has no remorse for fatally shooting a registered sex offender, authorities said.

According to the Vanderburgh County Sheriff’s Office, 34-year-old Ricky Allen Kiper Jr. shot and killed 41-year-old James C. McClernon on Wednesday.

Investigators said Kiper knocked on the front door of a home, asked for McClernon, then shot him.

Officials said Kiper told them he killed McClernon because he was a sex offender. Investigators said Kiper was not remorseful, and he told them his actions were justified.

McClernon’s family told WFIE that while McClernon was on the sex offender registry, it was for a situation that occurred more than two decades ago in Canada. The family said McClernon got into an altercation with an adult woman, served his time, and was not placed on the sex offender registry in Canada.

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

19 thoughts on “IN: Man shows no remorse for fatally shooting registered sex offender

  • October 6, 2022

    Capital murder.
    Give him the death penalty.
    While Indiana will never get around to exercising it, I would still like them to impose it.

    Reply
  • October 6, 2022

    pathetic. This is a hitlist. I’m tired of writing Desantis and telling him how this has destroyed any chance of me having a family or being a successful, contributing member of this society. It destroys your sex life and relationships to the point that they want you to commit a heinous act out of desperation.

    Reply
    • October 6, 2022

      Unfortunately, DeSantis is in politics for any personal benefits he can gain. He couldn’t care less about a person he knows can’t vote. He’s not about to take a stand on what is right…correct!

      Reply
      • October 6, 2022

        This appears to be in Indiana and not in Florida. Either way it is wrong. I’m just not sure if felons can regain the right to vote in Indiana. I know in Illinois they can’t. What will it take for politicians to not be so scared to stand up to each other to change these laws?

        Reply
  • October 6, 2022

    I contacted one of the authors of the article. He replied that Mr. Kiper’s trial is tentatively scheduled for January 23 of 2023.

    Reply
  • October 6, 2022

    What is the chance the media will cover the news for the next few days discussing how horrible this family’s loss is? Any time there is a hate crime, and yes this is a hate crime, it is on fire for the media.

    Reply
    • October 6, 2022

      The man will probably be hailed as a hero and someone will make a ‘go fund me’ site to help pay for his attorney just like many people regard vigilantes that kill people with sex offenses heroes.

      Reply
    • October 6, 2022

      If it’s not racially motivated, the media doesn’t like to report on it.

      Reply
      • October 6, 2022

        This IS a media report.

        Reply
  • October 6, 2022

    When a crime is committed towards a specific demographic it is considered a hate crime. In my humble opinion this IS a hate crime. This man was specifically targeted because of his status on the registry. Imagine if there was a registry where you could find all the minority groups in your area I’m sure any attacks on them would be considered a hate crime. That’s why I believe the murder of this man should also be looked at as a hate crime.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *