International Megan’s Law to Prevent Child Exploitation and Other Sexual Crimes Through Advanced Notification of Traveling Sex Offenders (IML) was supposed to be a tool for the federal government to notify other countries regarding the international travel of sex offenders. In theory, it was supposed to authorize federal agents to provide warnings in the form of a “green notice” to the receiving country. By providing this notice, the receiving country could protect their children from sexual abuse.

The sponsor of the bill, Rep. Smith said, “With its international law enforcement relations, technological and communications capability, and established sex offender registry system, the United States must lead the global community in the effort to save thousands of potential child victims by notifying other countries of travel by sex offenders who pose a high risk of exploiting children overseas. In turn, we must impress upon other countries that they are expected to do the same. Children everywhere deserve no less.”

That was the theory… In practice, IML has been a miserable failure. Perhaps the most glaring example; yesterday, a formal Federal Agent was sentenced to 124 months in prison for traveling to the Philippines to sexually assault a 14 year old.

In a statement contained in a press release announcing the sentence, Homeland Security Special Agent R. Sean Fitzgerald, stated, “this sentence sends an important message to all predators. We will not allow any crime against children to go unpunished,” “We, alongside our law enforcement partners, are committed to holding these kind of criminals accountable for their heinous crimes.” Very strong words, but what does he mean by sending a message to ‘all predators’, ‘our law enforcement partners’ and ‘these kind of criminals’? The individual convicted was a federal agent! He is your law enforcement partner. What did IML do to protect his victim or prevent his conduct?

Each year IML blocks thousands of individuals from traveling internationally. It prevents people from visiting ailing relatives in other countries. It prevents businesspersons from doing legitimate international business. And it prevents people with absolutely no nefarious intent from taking a family vacation to a country they always wanted to visit. While the federal government is aware of the very low rate of recidivism of people with a history of a sexual offense, they indiscriminately presume that everyone in this category has the sole intention of committing a sexual offense when traveling, while they themselves are free to travel and commit the crimes anyhow.

Despite this tool, a law enforcement agent was able to commit the exact offense it was intended to prevent! IML is a failure!

Please write to your representative in congress and ask them to abolish IML: https://www.congress.gov/members/find-your-member

Share This

Let's Spread Truth

Share this post!