Jacksonville PD speaking out against “Predator Poaching”
The Jacksonville Police Department is speaking out against the practice of “Predator Poaching” on their Facebook account. “We want to be clear: Vigilante investigations are dangerous. They can spread false information, compromise evidence and put victims or bystanders at greater risk,” they wrote.
“Predator poaching” on social media usually refers to private citizens or online groups posing as minors, luring people into sexual conversations about minors, and then arranging in-person “stings” to confront them. These encounters are often filmed and posted to platforms like YouTube, Facebook, or TikTok under the banner of exposing alleged predators. But more often than not, the motivation behind the videos is not altruistic. Platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Facebook pay creators based on views, ad clicks, and sponsorships. Predator sting videos often get millions of views, which means big money. Many predator poaching operations are less about protecting children and more about chasing clout, followers, and ad revenue. This transforms “predator poaching” from a supposed public safety mission into entertainment drama for profit.
While it may sound like vigilante justice, it’s generally considered a bad idea for several reasons. First are the legal issues. Targets are publicly shamed without charges, trials, or convictions. This can ruin reputations even if no crime was actually committed. Civilian “decoys” don’t follow the same investigative protocols as law enforcement, which can taint evidence and make real prosecutions nearly impossible. Next come the safety risks. Confrontations with alleged predators can quickly become dangerous, sometimes leading to fights, assaults, or even shootings. Private vigilantes lack training in de-escalation and evidence handling, which means that Courts typically reject evidence gathered by vigilantes. Third are the social consequences. Videos spread virally, leading to mob harassment, doxxing, or even attacks on suspects’ families. Innocent people may be misidentified or falsely accused, and even if cleared later, the internet rarely forgets.
What may look like justice on social media is often nothing more than dangerous vigilante theater. “Predator poaching” stings don’t follow the law, don’t hold up in court, and too often are staged for clicks, followers, and advertising revenue. Every share, like, and view fuels this reckless cycle. If you truly care about protecting children, don’t support or promote vigilante “sting” content.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This whole situation is a mess. A current registrant was caught by one of these “vigilantes” with child sexual abuse material on his phone and JSO didnt take it. The video was released and the public lost their minds, so JSO back peddled and took his phone(while stating they always had his phone, but who really knows) They also arrested him for registry violations (not sure which ones either, they didnt say) But the damage has already been done. The “vigilantes ” look like heroes, JSO looks foolish, and this idiot registrant just made it that much harder on everyone else. Their well intended message has fallen on deaf ears.
I’d call Jacksonville PD out for hypocrisy on this one. “Do as I say not as I do. “
Here’s a solution, abolish the registry. Oh wait, stupid me.
The article points out why vigilante stings are dangerous, but it actually leaves out something really important: in Florida, it’s not just risky — it’s against the law.
Under Florida Statute § 775.21(10)(d), it’s illegal to misuse sex offender registry information. That includes publishing false details, altering or distorting registry data, or using it for harassment or extortion.
So in Florida, vigilante “sting” groups and people who circulate misleading registry info aren’t just playing with fire socially — they’re stepping into criminal territory. Florida’s law makes it clear.
But will they be prosecuted for doing so? That is the question.
Nope!
I was blackmailed once and I went to the Tallahassee Police and the Leon county sheriffs office. BOTH officers on duty found it amusing and made excuses as to why they couldn’t do anything. They oth said that the information was public and that already public information was what was threatened to be shared. They COMPLETELY kept skipping over the fact that I was being extorted for money. Even when I kept insisting that blackmail was illegal, they would tell me, with a little smirk on their face, that sharing public information isn’t illegal. They would never acknowledge the extortion part. I’d say extortion is illegal. The reply was that sharing public information isn’t.
It isn’t about the sharing!