Lawyer suing Pasco County wants Sheriff Chris Nocco held in contempt

You gotta love attorney Patrick Leduc! The former military JAG attorney will not allow himself to be intimidated or pushed around and will certainly not allow his clients to be either.

When he forwarded us an FYI copy of his pleading yesterday, the first thought that came to mind was, “hell yeah!!!”

As registered citizens (or family of registered citizens) we know how vulnerable a position we are in. We’re the low hanging fruit. Harassing us is easy to get away with… nobody gives a shit. Threatening us is cake… tie your shoes wrong and you wind up with a third degree felony. You normally have no choice but to sit back and take it. The fact that 230+ registrants are sleeping homeless along the railroad tracks in Miami is a testament to how badly you can push around sex offenders in the State of Florida.

Then comes Patrick Leduc, who can’t stand to see the injustice taking place and won’t let it stand. When police came to his client’s house a couple of weeks ago to “persuade” his client to not join the lawsuit, Mr. Leduc had the Court issue an order instructing the police to stop the harassment.  Then guess what? An officer shows up and let’s the client know police will be stepping up compliance checks.

Who knows whether the Judge will hold the Sheriff in contempt? After all, they share the same employer… the County. But as unlikely as that might happen, at least this motion sends a message to Pasco County that there IS someone out there willing to stand up for registered citizens and maybe the police should stick to just doing their job.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

15 thoughts on “Lawyer suing Pasco County wants Sheriff Chris Nocco held in contempt

  • April 10, 2016

    Pasco changed Fl address verification. To Compliance check

    Reply
    • April 10, 2016

      Cooly told FL sheriff he world reaffend. They let him free. Lungsfford unattended. Door flung open. .Pasco on band wagon

      Reply
  • April 8, 2016

    why can’t the police/county be sued for harassment as it is suppose to be against the law to harassment anyone on the hit list

    Reply
  • April 6, 2016

    Thank you!!! Colonel Ledue…

    Reply
      • April 7, 2016

        The good news though is none of them were registered citizens. They keep catching everyone else. Although it’s not a good thing for these people to do do this at least it’s not registered citizens offending which again shows the registries unusefullness….

        Reply
        • April 7, 2016

          They weren’t even sexual offenses

          Reply
          • April 7, 2016

            FAC ADMIN – what do you mean by “they weren’t even sexual offenses?”

            I get that these stories are slanted toward “child-abuse” behavior when the real story is “law-manipulation” behavior but the charges listed (granted they do not quote statutes) use language that relates to the criminal codes for sex offenses.

            Reply
            • April 7, 2016

              The “incidents” that the deputy was referring to when he said they would be cracking down on Sex Offenders more, had nothing to do with Sex offenses.

              This from the Tampa Tribune, “There’s been a lot of unfortunate situations that have occurred that have prompted this,” Collazo told Wright, then specifically referred to two incidents: when John Jonchuck threw his 5-year-old daughter, Pheobe, off the approach to the Sunshine Skyway bridge in January 2015; and when 11-year-old Janiya Thomas was found dead in a padlocked freezer in Bradenton in October. Neither incident, however, involved sex offenders.”

              That was the excuse law enforcement used when they told Leduc’s client they were cracking down on sex offenders more.

              Reply
          • April 7, 2016

            Oh, yes. Got ya. I thought the same thing. I thought you were referring to the sting story posted above. I don’t recall the statutes that require “compliance checks” making reference to increasing checks when any other crime occurs in the State. (There’s sarcasm in there…)

            Reply
            • April 8, 2016

              There’s a reason we tell people…

              When a sheriff’s deputy (not your probation officer, but just the compliance checks) comes to do your compliance check, hand them your drivers license or ID and offer nothing else. Be polite, be courteous, thank them for their professionalism and comment on the great weather we’re having but nothing else. If all the information that you registered is correct – they have access to it and do not need to interrogate you on it or collect it again.
              If they don’t have a warrant – don’t let them in your house. You don’t need someone planting something.

              Reply
  • April 6, 2016

    The word is out Sherriff, we see how you work……Great job,Leduc!!!!!!

    Reply
  • April 6, 2016

    Awesome. It sounds like the tide is starting to turn!

    Also, see this article:

    http://www.news4jax.com/news/florida/columbia-county/officer-injured-at-columbia-correctional_

    Maybe these idiots will start to realize getting bad press in the prison system will not fare well for them with the general public. And having been in prison, I can tell you that ratio is correct!! Ours was 172:2 in each dorm. Overcrowding the prison system with minor drug offenses and scam sex sting operation victims, is starting to bite Florida in the ass!

    Reply
  • April 6, 2016

    Compliance checks are no other than nosy cops looking for wrongdoing to make a arrest. Local police agencies making up their own rules even though tge registrants are compliant at the county and state level. Its harassment and instead of working to keep a watchful eye makes a registrant crazy with worry and anxiety adding to antisocial behaviour.

    Reply
    • April 6, 2016

      100% Right

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *