Listen: Oral Arguments in 6th Circuit Sex Offender Arguments

Yesterday Oral Argument was heard in three related cases. You can listen to the arguments. In 1 the Defendants appeal the judgment in this class action challenging the constitutionality of Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act. In 2 Plaintiffs appeal the judgment in their action challenging the constitutionality of Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act.

We invite you to listen and share your opinion on how it went.

Click to Listen – 1
Click to Listen – 2


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “Listen: Oral Arguments in 6th Circuit Sex Offender Arguments

  • July 22, 2026

    I think there are strong arguments for us here in both hearings.
    If in hearing #2, in-person registration is judged a violation of habeas corpus, this would be a landmark case across United States and that sorna is not a constitunionally covered aspect concerning in-person registration-we have to be somewhere, at a certain time, or else be prosecuted if we are not there in a situation not covered by the Constitution, regardless that it is a so-called civil regulatory scheme.
    Civil regulatory schemes are not supposed to be punitive, but this is, and I think that would have been a good argument as well.

    Reply
    • July 22, 2026

      On this I would agree. I thought i read a while back about a Habeas case about whether or not SORNA places us “In Custody”

      Reply
  • July 22, 2026

    Second one was better for us in that the one Justice mentioned stop and Frisk as well was as the whole scheme being a form of Seizure. We will see, but not holding my breath. Until SCOTUS says, SORA, SORNA can not be applied retroactively. We are stuck.

    Reply
  • July 22, 2026

    Almost done with the first recording. Ouch not good for us. If SORA is expost Facto, so is SORNA. The reason why states can make it retroactive is because the Attorney General said you could back in 2005. That is when the flood gates opened up. In My opinion so far I think the court rules for the State. Sad to say.

    Reply
  • July 22, 2026

    the 2nd hearing, i think we are detained and every year they pile on more n more bs the longer we are detained. also, lawyer told me in my county that there is an issue with the lady doing the registration where she sometimes did not enter all the information provided into the computer system.

    Reply
    • July 22, 2026

      Wow even if i do not like going to hernando sheriff office to register 2 times a year by florida law they have a setup where you see pn a monitor everything the officer is entering at the same time they are typing it. Officer will as before any save button to verify and at end of course you sign. This makes accountability on both ends

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *