Listen to Guy Hamilton Smith, Legal Fellow at the Mitchell Hamline School of Law Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center, discuss his article “The Digital Wilderness: A Decade of Exile & the False Hopes of Lester Packingham.”
Ex Post Facto – Sustainer
Recent Comments
- Florida Action Committee on Excellent decision out of Alabama Federal Court: “This case does not impact Florida. You will have to get the new license with the marker in blue in…”
- Tearful Eagle on Excellent decision out of Alabama Federal Court: “As my license is up for renewal in January, do we know if the case was appealed? I…”
- beefstew327 on Homeless sex offender listed intersection near middle school as his address: “Speaking of those who became homeless of the Registery.. Could we please get an update on the Ex post facto…”
- Florida Action Committee on Homeless sex offender listed intersection near middle school as his address: “This is excellent”
- James on Homeless sex offender listed intersection near middle school as his address: “I found an email address for media relations for the parent company, Cox Media Group. This is the email I…”
- WHL on Homeless sex offender listed intersection near middle school as his address: “I second your opinion about channel 9.”
- Tired Of Being Mistreated on Homeless sex offender listed intersection near middle school as his address: “We've got to keep an eye on "Them" !!!!!????!. Meanwhile, Their neighbors, That are "Normal People", Like Police, Firemen,…”
- texas on The YMCA bans persons required to register as sex offenders, but how has that worked out for them?: “I was a member of the YMCA here in Texas, one day they call me in and tell we are…”
- Bill on Homeless sex offender listed intersection near middle school as his address: “Channel 9 news is the worst in Central Floriduh. So it's no wonder they don't have a comment section. That's…”
- Jack on Homeless sex offender listed intersection near middle school as his address: “Orange county is pretty forgiving as far as the registry restrictions. If they ever change it, hope they do not…”
Text Registration Reminders
Get reminded to register on your months via SMS text messages. Just text "START" to 727-233-4785 to begin -OR- click HERE for more details. This flyer can be printed and shared with others freely.
No warranty or liability implied. It is always YOUR responsibility to register. Intended as a backup reminder. Service provided free as a courtesy. Standard text message rates may apply.
Packingham was a hollow victory. We won the civil right to access Facebook, but as a private entity Facebook can discriminate with impunity, without fear of consequences.
It was anything but a hollow victory. It was a landmark victory!
Prior to Packingham, state law made it a felony for a registrant to access any site that could potentially be used to communicate privately or publicly with a minor. Including news sites where people could respond to one another’s comments. It might have been a felony to access that site for news, if it contained that feature.
I don’t agree with selected sites’ (mainly Facebook’s) private policies about who has access, but compared to pre-Packingham, much better off.
So it was a win for North Carolina, but they, and the other 49 states, still can’t access Facebook.
Better off, sure, but I think one of the questions that remains to be answered is by how much exactly? While states can’t directly ban access to social media, they seem to continue to be free to do indirectly what is not longer constitutionally permissible to do directly.
Louisiana, for example, has a law that requires people on the reg to include — in their social media profile — that they are a sex offender, what their crime was, and their home address. My opinion is that such a law operates as a ban as a matter of fact, if not law.
This is, of course, to say nothing of the fact that private firms like FB are free to enact their own bans.
Packingham, as good and important as it is, is not the end of the story. It’s just the start.
And the statute challenged in Packingham did not just cover Facebook, as the podcast I think makes clear. It covered all manner of online forums plus almost any site that happened to contain some sort of forum feature within it.
Had not Packingham challenged that statute, then many other state legislatures, including Florida’s, might have been tempted to suppress registants’ online access in a way that goes well beyond Facebook’s terms of use.