Member Submission: A Blogger Registry. Really?
Governor Ron DeSantis is under attack for suggesting a registry for bloggers who write about him or his administration. He’s now distanced himself from the proposed law. He says he had nothing to do with it. Whether he did or did not isn’t the question. The question is, why would anyone think such a registry is a good idea?
The rationale for registries has always been straightforward: they are administrative measures needed to protect the public. People are required to register many things: for driving a car, sailing a boat, flying a plane, signing up for the draft, cutting hair for a living, etcetera.
But anyone reading this website doesn’t need to be told that those aren’t the only type of registries. There is another kind of registry that is designed to shame unpopular minorities. These registries have a long history. California set up one almost 80 years ago for gay people. Today every state has a sex offender registry. Some states have other registries: for animal abusers, domestic abusers, arsonists, etc.
The proposed blogger registry seems to fit the second category. That’s why it has attracted so much opposition. But people opposing it again need to ask themselves that simple question: why would anyone think it is a good idea?
The answer is obvious: Sex offender registries have granted legitimacy to collective shaming. The anti-bloggers make a point: If a registry is o.k. for one group of people, it’s o.k. for another. And another.
In most states it is not necessary to demonstrate that an individual is dangerous for that person to be put on a sex offender registry. The same is true under Federal law. And even if someone can be shown to be dangerous, it is not necessary to demonstrate that putting this person’s name and face and address on a public registry will protect the public.
There is only one thing the registries actually demonstrate: that the people subjected to them are categorically unpopular.
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch stated in his dissent in the Gundy case: “Yes, those affected are some of the least popular among us. But if a single executive branch official can write laws restricting the liberty of this group of persons, what does that mean for the next?”
The proposed blogger registry is a legislative, not an executive, edict. But that doesn’t mean it is any more justifiable. Lawmaking should not be an unpopularity contest.
“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Those famous words of Martin Luther King, Jr. apply to registries, too. Bloggers beware.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I got this today from a Ministry I follow even though I am not Jewish. Although they do not mention us, what they sent me in their newsletter could have almost as easily switched out Jewish to Sex offender. You have to read this below yourself and see why it touched me enough to post it. I had to read that 3 times to let it sink in.
From Friends of Israel Ministry:
“Unless you are Jewish, it is difficult for us to understand what Jewish people experience, even today: hatred for who you are, persecution and betrayal by those who profess friendship, and to live believing the whole world is against your very existence.”
The registry today along with special markings on drivers’ licenses is nothing more than another form of the ‘Star of David’.
And don’t forget the large “J” that was stamped on Jewish passports in the 1930’s. Kind of like our passport stamp? History often repeats itself.
History
Hum, I know a lot about history, but I did not know about the J stamp. Frankly I guess I didn’t think there were passports back then. Even up until recently, many countries didn’t even have border guards.
About 20 years ago, right after I got off probation, I went to Germany and Austria. When I got off the train in Austria, the station was empty, and I walked through the turn stills with my sister and the only way we knew we were in Austria was a line on the ground stating we were crossing the border once we crossed the turn stills from the train.
Capt.
Yes but that little insignia was responsible for at least 2 million murders. If those drivers license notices are as insignificant as they claim then there is no need for it. Is it to protect the police officer who asks for your license? I’m not aware of a rash of sex offenders attacking police. Or am I missing something?
I don’t think any committee members will take seriously the notion that the red font could lead to murder. I would avoid that as a talking point.
I know myself. The folks who know me know what kind of a person that I am. I do not lose any sleep over what someone on the internet might say about me. If it is negative, then it is said out of ignorance and not worthy of my time.