Member Submission: Jacksonville’s “Compliance Check” and What Registrants Need to Know

The below was submitted by our Duval County Coordinators. We felt it was important to share it with our broader membership.

Recently the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office publicized arrests from a compliance check on registrants. Compliance checks are getting a lot of publicity from FAC and your Duval coordinators want to let you know more detail about Duval County.

Unlike St Johns County, Jacksonville did not make special visits to targeted registrants looking for violations. Jacksonville has almost 3,000 registrants and arrests are being made all the time. Jacksonville took about 2 months worth of arrests and called them a compliance check for the publicity. They did not make a special effort to find internet identifier problems or car registration slip-ups.

Of the 59 arrests, 10 were career offenders. These were men who now must register like we have been registering. We will share some information about the 49 arrests of those who are obligated to register because of a prior sex offense conviction or adjudication.

One problem group of registrants was identified because they moved to a new address. They reported the address. That is good. They failed to change their driver license address or ID. That is bad. When an address change is reported to JREC, it gets assigned for a follow-up visit by the detective. From the arrest reports it seems that about one week after the move is reported, they check the driver license database. If the address has not been changed, they seem to wait another week to check. After two no changes, an arrest is made. If you do not have proper documentation for your driver license at the new address, registrants are reminded to get a letter from that office saying that you came by. It will give you instructions on future deadlines.

A second group of registrants was arrested because they missed the registration month. That is a guaranteed way to end up on the problem list.

The manner in which registrants are charged for failing to proper register does indicate whether the detective is showing some leniency towards that particular arrestee. The registration statute has a felony charge for not registering correctly or lying. Jacksonville detectives sometimes also add a misdemeanor charge of resisting arrest when a person does not show up on time or doesn’t report correctly. Whether you have the felony charge, or the misdemeanor charge is important for sentencing. A felony conviction requires a minimum of 6 months community control which will include a GPS monitor. A misdemeanor conviction requires no community control or GPS monitor.

For example, one arrestee came a couple days after his missed month to register explaining that his mother had died the previous month. He was arrested. He was charged with felony failure to register and the misdemeanor resisting arrest. He could not bond out. At his arraignment hearing 20 days later he was givien time served and released based upon the misdemeanor charge while the felony failure to register was dismissed. If a registrant has had problems before with registration, they usually receive the felony charge. A private attorney representing one person negotiated that charge down to misdemeanor resisting. So, there is a strategy to get the misdemeanor charge.

So remember, when you move, report to JREC and the license agency. And do remember your registration months. FAC has a registration reminder system that can send you text messages if you sign up.

One final reminder. A search warrant is required to search your phone if you are not on probation. You can politely decline.

Duval Coordinators


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “Member Submission: Jacksonville’s “Compliance Check” and What Registrants Need to Know”

  • October 19, 2026

    The reason they’re encouraged to actively do these so-called “compliance checks” is much in the same way speed limit “traps” function. Like going deep sea fishing where the deck monkeys reel-in the net to observe their catch in hopes of catching “the big one.” Incidentally, both the registry and speed limit rules are for-profit laws that masquerade as public safety initiatives.

    While the cops call it “being proactive,” I call it gaming the system for “failure crumbs” in hopes of filing news charges for an easy conviction.

    Reply
  • October 19, 2026

    Thanks for the info. I had to look up JREC, Jacksonville Re-Entry Center, if what I found is correct. We don’t have anything like that, must go to the jail to register.

    Reply
  • October 19, 2026

    Thank you for sharing this information and doing research on it for those that are curious.

    Could all of this (registries/aggressive arrests) be a test, a sort of preliminary set up, for survelliancey/control system for the future?

    Reply
    • October 19, 2026

      Some of our members feel that it already is a system of surveillance and control.

      Reply
      • October 19, 2026

        I don’t think it’s any secret. If you read the legislative intent of the very first bill, HB 1665 (1993) that established the predator act (CH 93-277), it expressly says “providing for the monitoring and tracking of registered sexual predators by law enforcement personnel”. Monitoring and surveillance are synonyms.

        Reply
        • October 19, 2026

          I agree Florida uses similar wording in several official sources.

          That monitoring language goes beyond just sex offender/predator language. Florida’s career-offender findings expressly say:

          “Registration is intended to aid law enforcement agencies in timely apprehending a career offender. Registration is not a punishment, but merely a status.”

          That is §775.26:
          https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2026/775.26

          The career-offender registration law also describes providing law enforcement with:

          “information on release and registration of career offenders for the purposes of monitoring, tracking, and prosecution.”

          §775.261(11)(c)1:
          https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2026/0775.261

          The sexual-predator statute uses the same three purposes:

          “on all released registered sexual predators for purposes of monitoring, tracking, and prosecution.”

          §775.21(6)(k)1:
          https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2026/0775.21

          And the Legislature directs its oversight review to examine:

          “ensuring the effective supervision and subsequent monitoring of sexual predators and offenders”

          §943.04353:
          https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2026/943.04353

          OPPAGA’s 2024 report states it plainly:

          “Local law enforcement monitors all registered sex offenders including offenders on FDC supervision.”

          Report 24-11, printed page 11:
          https://oppaga.fl.gov/Documents/Reports/24-11.pdf#page=12

          Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *