MI: lawmakers debate changes to states sex offender registry law

Michigan lawmakers are debating how to overhaul the state’s sex offender registry after a federal appeals court ruled sections of the law are unconstitutional, but Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel is contending the proposed fixes don’t repair the law’s flaws.

As Democratic and Republican elected officials wrestle over the best solution to a highly charged issue, a federal judge has freed the state’s 44,000 convicted sex offenders from complying with registry reporting requirements because of the novel coronavirus outbreak and confusion about the current registry.

Among the state’s registry restrictions the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down in 2016 were a ban on convicted sex offenders from living, working or loitering within 1,000 feet of schools and a 2011 revision of the law that put sex offenders back on the registry permanently if they committed a felony after they had served their sentences and had been taken off the registry.

The appeals court ruled that parts of the registry violated the 1st and 14th Amendments, and the constitutional protection against being punished “ex post facto,” or retroactively.

Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

34 thoughts on “MI: lawmakers debate changes to states sex offender registry law

  • June 12, 2020

    JJJJ
    obvious Mr Brandon dont share to the group with the names and emails of the people

    Reply
    • June 13, 2020

      I’m not a Michigan resident and never have been. Just like you I responded to this post with my thoughts. Guess I need your approval to write to lawmakers that have and never will make laws impacting my life.

      Reply
      • June 14, 2020

        Sir, have you read the bill that they are proposing?

        Maybe we all need to email them!
        Believe me, brother when I say, you don’t need anybody’s permission to send as many emails as you like.
        Just please send them!
        (They’ll read emails from non-residents too, I believe.)

        Reply
        • June 15, 2020

          Does anybody have the link from the committee meeting about Michigan’s proposed bill? I need that for ammunition to my arguments that the majority of the residents were against the bill.

          Reply
  • June 9, 2020

    If I were the judge in Michigan I’d hold all of the legislators in contempt of court. Maybe then those piss ants will never defy a judge again.

    Reply
  • June 8, 2020

    Michigan State Police Col. Joseph Gasper … also called for stricter rules governing sex offenders who move to Michigan from other states.

    “Any revision of (the law) should ensure and clarify that an individual convicted in another state of an offense requiring sex offender registration in that state should, at a minimum, be required to register in Michigan for a similar duration under substantially similar terms regardless of the date of offense,” he wrote.

    “Otherwise, registered sex offenders from other states with offenses prior to Michigan’s 2011 amendments to (the law) could seek sanctuary from all sex offender registration by simply relocating to Michigan.”

    Reply
  • June 8, 2020

    With all the talk of criminal justice reform, this is the perfect time to discuss the need for reform of the registry and all the draconian laws that go with it. I have been looking for such articles to comment on the need to include registrants in this reform.

    Since then, I have had my own personal Facebook account compromised with some unsolicited activity. I deleted that account. FAC made it possible for me to continue posting comments under a different account name. I had great success for 5 days. I have now been locked out of that account because of suspicious activity.

    I am starting to wonder if there is someone out there who is determined to stop my comments. I am not giving up.

    Reply
    • June 8, 2020

      So sorry this is happening on fb SarahF. It has become such a toxic place since I was last there, possibly giving an outlet to vigilantes, yet you potentially reach a wide audience. Heartburn.

      Reply
  • June 8, 2020

    Jacob

    I can email NARSOL and Nebraskans Unafraid about advocacy groups in Iowa. I have to do something with all this time on my hands due to a blown out knee.

    Reply
  • June 8, 2020

    all I know of is IowaRSOadvocate
    @cnvtmiller_k on twitter but no response out of her
    we need someone on twitter as well to get to her

    Reply
    • June 11, 2020

      I received an email from her. I won’t post her email unless I have permission.

      Reply
      • June 12, 2020

        @ Brandon
        Looks as if fishers bill didnt stick to the wall this time around

        Reply
      • June 12, 2020

        no need to post the email just if the bill is dead or ongoing? or outcome

        Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *