MI: Ypsilanti adds ex-offenders as protected class in nondiscrimination ordinance

YPSILANTI, MI – People with felony convictions cannot be discriminated against in Ypsilanti in a new addition to the city’s non-discrimination ordinance that passed Tuesday.

Ypsilanti City Council voted unanimously to make ex-offenders a city-protected class at its meeting on March 3. Elected officials said the move will help returning citizens reintegrate into society and address racial disparities.

 SOURCE

Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

15 thoughts on “MI: Ypsilanti adds ex-offenders as protected class in nondiscrimination ordinance

  • March 13, 2020

    Berkeley, California is committed to providing equal opportunities to people whose lives were changed by criminal charges and who are seeking to reintegrate into society. But they are excluding “lifetime sex offenders”. What is a lifetime sex offender — someone who continues to re-offend? Or someone put on the registry for life because of a one-time sexual offense? I hope it is the former.

    https://www.dailycal.org/2020/03/13/give-all-tenants-a-fair-chance/

    Reply
  • March 5, 2020

    Don’t miss the point members. While any such action is a step in the right direction, it does still point out how sex offenders are discriminated against more than other offenders, even where people claim that they are against discrimination. More evidence that sex offenders should be recognized as a class, and eventually work towards class protection.

    Reply
  • March 5, 2020

    This actually makes good sense and will turn out well for sex offenders.

    Michigan’s registry is about to go down in flames. The legislature doesn’t have the balls to touch it with a 100 ft rod because making it any less draconian is political suicide.
    If it goes down, they blame the courts and save face.

    Then, when the registry and accompanying restrictions are gone, the only valid law in town will be the current one forbidding discrimination against ex-cons.

    You know, the one without any specific provisions excluding those who have been convicted of sexual crimes.

    If this is by design and not simple oversight, these people should be thanked.

    Reply
  • March 5, 2020

    The difference between Ex-offenders and Sex offenders is NOT the letter S.
    The difference is most ex offenders can somewhat go on with their lives where as as Ex sex-offenders are still considered sex offenders for life and not given a chance to be a productive citizen.

    Can’t get a job

    Can’t find a place to live

    Can’t date ( who is going to date someone on the registry )

    Can’t go to church ( according to some new posts )

    Can’t travel

    Can’t be near a school, playground, park, etc

    Can’t get home insurance ( mine dropped and had to move )

    Would like a judge to tell us #1 How this is not punishment And #2 What the Hell we can do? Maybe go to jail, do not pass GO!

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *