In a decision issued today, the Federal Court for the District of Minnesota granted a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of a West St. Paul sex offender residency restriction.

Calling it a close call in light of 8th Circuit precedent that previously found SORRs constitutional, the Judge found that the West St. Paul Ordinance is significantly more restrictive than those upheld by the Eighth Circuit and was persuaded by the recent persuasive precedent from other federal circuits (including our 11th Circuit) which found otherwise.

The opinion concluded that West St. Paul’s ordinance was too far sweeping and the lack of an individualized risk assessment to determine who should be subject to it, “doomed” their ordinance.

While this decision is not binding on us here in Florida, the more wins accumulated nationwide, the better. Also, the citation of our Miami-Dade SORR case as persuasive was a nice mention!

Share This

Let's Spread Truth

Share this post!