Ex Post Facto – Sustainer 2024
Recent Comments
- Dustin on Seventh Circuit considers challenges to Wisconsin sex offense laws: “I get the impression that the judges are looking for reasons to avoid ruling or opining and to ignore the…”
- David on Harper v. Glass – Order and Impact: “I thought that there were more issues in the pleadings. No real relief or Due Process in Florida!”
- JZ on Results of Harper v. Glass Order beginning October 1, 2024: “Why is FAC stating that the Harper v. Glass Order goes into effect on October 1st? The…”
- Whyme on Results of HB 1235 beginning October 1, 2024: “Wasn t a judge, no order issued it was the actual corrections cop? Just doesnt feel right.”
- RM on Results of HB 1235 beginning October 1, 2024: “A small number of states (including Alaska and Utah) require registering if you are there for any amount of time,…”
- JZ on Results of HB 1235 beginning October 1, 2024: “In an effort to alleviate some of the confusion surrounding HB 1235, here is a link to the final summary…”
- Eugene V. Debs on News Sharing and General Commentary: “Supreme Court Homeless case https://www.youtube.com/live/b09VVQUCqKw?feature=shared only thing that mentions our potential issue is around the 1:56 hr mark”
More comments…
Want to see more? Click here to see the most recent 100 comments.
Text Registration Reminders
Get reminded to register on your months via SMS text messages. Just text "START" to 727-233-4785 to begin -OR- click HERE for more details and a flyer which can be printed and shared with others.
No warranty or liability implied. It is always YOUR responsibility to register. Intended as a backup reminder. Service provided free as a courtesy. Standard text message rates may apply.
This is only a clip.. found everywhere on Twitter. The original was over ten minutes long and so far I have not found another copy of it anywhere.
And of course the only place with the clip uses just 2m of it. Afraid of the other 8m I bet.
Not seeing anything except that the video was removed for violating terms of service
Anyone have a non-YouTube link? Apparently, they already took it down for “violating YT’s ToS” 🙄
Not in the main Tweet. In the comments on it.
I concur with Jacob. Nothing about arrests, just their excuse/explanation for not having the paper available for reading.
We are at religious levels of moral panic. But this is nothing new. Science is not immune to human biases.
Hello, all! I just found this in my Twitter feed. Here are “scientists” talking about launching an investigation to arrest subjects in an experiment who masturbated to Japanese cartoons.
This makes me so angry, but if I leave a critical comments I’ll look like a “pro child rape” advocate. Here’s the Tweet:
https://twitter.com/neuro_skeptic/status/1557452366756077568
Not seeing anything in the link that proposes arrests.
It’s fair for a publisher to scrutinize how they came to rely on a study that used such material.
Most of these “controversial” studies are only controversial in the sense they come to conclusions people don’t WANT to hear.
Excellent point, Derek!
The study’s conclusions were not controversial. The methodology was. I would not condone it.
People whose main concern is what they look like never change anything and usually look like fools or rogues into the bargain.
I’m not saying this particular tweet is worth putting time and energy into argumentive commentary. tl/dr. But we have to get in the habit of mixing it up on social media in general. Talking to each other is nice just like talking to your own family is nice, but it’s not everything.