Most folks are making incorrect assumptions about “minor-attracted persons”
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
13 thoughts on “Most folks are making incorrect assumptions about “minor-attracted persons””
Comment Policy
- PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
- Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
- Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
- *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
- Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
- Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
- *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
- Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
- Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information
Not seeing anything except that the video was removed for violating terms of service
Anyone have a non-YouTube link? Apparently, they already took it down for “violating YT’s ToS” 🙄
Not in the main Tweet. In the comments on it.
I concur with Jacob. Nothing about arrests, just their excuse/explanation for not having the paper available for reading.
We are at religious levels of moral panic. But this is nothing new. Science is not immune to human biases.
Hello, all! I just found this in my Twitter feed. Here are “scientists” talking about launching an investigation to arrest subjects in an experiment who masturbated to Japanese cartoons.
This makes me so angry, but if I leave a critical comments I’ll look like a “pro child rape” advocate. Here’s the Tweet:
https://twitter.com/neuro_skeptic/status/1557452366756077568
Not seeing anything in the link that proposes arrests.
It’s fair for a publisher to scrutinize how they came to rely on a study that used such material.
Most of these “controversial” studies are only controversial in the sense they come to conclusions people don’t WANT to hear.
Excellent point, Derek!
The study’s conclusions were not controversial. The methodology was. I would not condone it.
People whose main concern is what they look like never change anything and usually look like fools or rogues into the bargain.
I’m not saying this particular tweet is worth putting time and energy into argumentive commentary. tl/dr. But we have to get in the habit of mixing it up on social media in general. Talking to each other is nice just like talking to your own family is nice, but it’s not everything.