Updated with correct link: Mother of victim speaks out, says James Fairbanks should walk free

“It’s unconscionable that they would think it would be okay to go and murder somebody because they’re on a registry,” said Vicki Henry, President of Women Against Registry.

Henry’s organization calls on state lawmakers to make the sex offender registry private. Henry believes the registry puts sex offenders, like Condoluci, in danger.

“The registry just does not help to protect people, two wrongs don’t make a right,” said Henry.

WATCH THE VIDEO


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

18 thoughts on “Updated with correct link: Mother of victim speaks out, says James Fairbanks should walk free

  • May 22, 2020

    Here is a copy of my complaint to the Nebraska Bar Association:

    to nsc.cfdcomplaints

    Hello:
    This email should be construed as a formal request for your organization to conduct an investigation of Attorney Steve Lefler.

    I make the following allegations, and provide proof in the form of the audio recording that is attached to this email.

    On or about 5/21/20 Steve Lefler appeared in an interview in which he implied that the people of the City of Omaha, Nebraska do have a “vein of righteousness” that allows them to ignore and pardon a pre-meditated first degree murder.

    He also implied that the people of Omaha would be quite willing to release a pre-meditated, first-degree murderer.

    In both instances, the deciding factor would be whether the crime victim was a person required to register with the sex offense registry.

    I am calling for this attorney to be sanctioned and counseled.

    The link to the original video news story is here:https://www.ketv.com/article/james-fairbanks-officially-charged-with-first-degree-murder-of-omaha-sex-offender/32629767

    Reply
  • May 22, 2020

    I Just called and left a voice message for Steve Lefler, the attorney for Fairbanks, the murderer.

    Attorney Lefler’s phone number is (402) 342-4433.

    My Question to Mr. Lefler was, “I just watched a video of you in which you called premeditated, first-degree murder a ‘vein of righteousness’. I was wondering if you have any further comment.”

    I am going to look into making a complaint against him with the Nebraska Bar. I will include the direct quote.

    Reply
  • May 22, 2020

    This is exactly why the registry is public. He was just doing what the local, state and federal governments wanted him to do for society. They will make this murderer look like the victim! Poor bastard was driven to “temporary insanity” by the guy he premeditatedly murdered! They will never make the registry private as long as it is working so well. Maybe he could use the stand your ground defense as well.

    Reply
  • May 22, 2020

    Link to the video no longer works, but I found another one just as bad on their website. I guess they have no problem advancing a dystopian view of justice, and calling it “righteous”. They might as well suggest throwing away this republic and instituting “The Purge”. At least in that scenario we would get to legally fight back… at a million strong, I’d say we’d have a good chance of making it.

    Seriously though, what has modern society devolved to, that mainstream media is willing to post this kind of stuff? It’s a reflection of the hearts of the people. So sad….

    Reply
    • May 22, 2020

      Interesting how most of the people that take the law into their own hands regarding the sex offender registry or some of the biggest miscreants you will ever see. Not exactly paragons of virtue looking to make society better.

      Reply
      • May 23, 2020

        That’s right Joe. This small and very vocal sect may, in fact, be simply using this as a way to act out their violent tendencies, hoping to get away with it by brushing the blame off on the victim.

        Interesting that it’s called justice by some to justify killing a person in the act of living a law-biding life… no crime in progress, not even threats or expressed intentions of such. Would anyone escape being subject to such a violent act under that definition? This warped view of justice is rotten from the inside out.

        What’s worse, the victim can’t speak for themselves and neither will the news organization apparently permit anyone to speak on his behalf. There is an agenda being advanced here without question.

        If voices of reason outside the registrant community don’t rise up to meet this threat, I don’t see much good in store for our country’s future. We may very well be witnessing the death of a free and just America.

        Reply
    • May 22, 2020

      Can you post the other link that you mentioned?

      What happened to the original story? Did they have a change of heart and take it down?

      Reply
      • May 23, 2020

        Link is fixed, the video currently posted is the one I found.

        Reply
    • May 23, 2020

      Amen!

      Reply
  • May 22, 2020

    No he should get the same thing they do for all other murd ers all others that did killing even in late teens don’t get a second chance he wanted to kill him others didn’t plan to kill so he shouldn’t walk

    Reply
    • May 22, 2020

      He should be given the death penalty. This guy clearly premeditated this and he doesn’t even have the “excuse“ of killing someone who killed or raped his child. He’s just some random a-hole Who should actually know better because he’s in the middle health field. So no excuse there either. He should’ve gotten professional help when he started having these homicidal ideations.!

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *