As mentioned last month, the Ex Post Facto Plus II is moving forward. Some of the claims were dismissed, but others are proceeding.

One of the claims that was dismissed was Vagueness. But the Statute is hopelessly vague when different people (including different employees of the FDLE) interpret meanings differently. As the Judge had to question the logic and meaning of some of the requirements, the Judge also illustrated the point that the statute is vague.

Earlier this week, Attorneys representing Jane Doe filed a Motion to Reconsider the dismissal of that claim. The Motion can be found below:

Jane Doe v Swearingen – Motion for Reconsideration

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Let's Spread Truth

Share this post!