Motion to Alter or Amend filed in Ex Post Facto Plus Case
As promised, the Ex Post Facto Plus case has not seen the end of the road. Yesterday, attorneys for the Does filed a Motion to Alter or Amend the Order. A copy of the Motion is below, but in lay terms it argues that the very recent 11th Circuit Court Case upon which the court relied should be distinguished from this one and/or the case should proceed as to the current Plaintiff’s obligations under the changes to the registry made within the statute of limitations (4 years prior to 2018) and/or the case should be amended to add a plaintiff who was added to the registry within the past 4 years as to the facial and as applied challenge of the entire registry statute.
And as promised hereafter, even if the current Motion is not successful and the case needs to be refiled with named plaintiffs who are all added to the registry within 4 years, the challenge will continue.
If you take a moment to read through the Motion, you will see the significant amount of work that has gone into this case and you will appreciate the efforts of the attorneys who are giving their all to fix this for us. We should also appreciate the donations of our members who helped fund this case.
We fight on!
Does v. Swearingen – Motion to Alter or Amend
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Oh yea! It’s on! Here we go again for another round. Like Detroit commented earlier. Never surrender!!!
Bob:
Thanks for the post. I don’t know if the Oliver Law Group is seeking monetary compensation in Does II or not but hope they are. I believe anyone kept on the registry after Does I became final should be seeking monetary damages. Let’s see how this whole thing plays out. This could get interesting.
Detroit, I hope they do sue for monitory damages, for the pain, suffering, emotional stress and lack of employment. When people start getting $$$ for their bull, then stupid laws will stop being made.
Let this be a reminder to donate as well. Even $5 helps. May everyone be having and have a blessed Holiday Season.
Thank you FAC for all you do!
NEVER SURRENDER!!!
Relentless!!! 👍 Love it!!! 😁👍👍👍
You realize that ex post facto is a means to force the government to handle millions of convictions, to track what laws are ex post facto and what laws must be applied.
For example, the jerks voided my passport, in violation of ex post facto, IML was not a law, when this idiot conviction took place. Therefore, all IML / passport branding is unlawfully applied to me, just can’t find a freaking attorney to challenge it in SF area.
This would cause such a freaking headache for them, it is not even funny, especially when moving to other states.
California loves to have people violate their 5th Amendment with their forms, my having them initial everything, even when the form says something unlawful, by ex post facto.
I believe they would drown in their red tape, for those forms, they would have to have a million of them.
For anyone who feels discouraged or hopeless, please follow the link below. This is an unrelated case but what happened to the woman can happen to any of us. So we must all keep fighting.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/colorado-grandmother-arrested-naked-2-4-million-settlement-fremont-county-carolyn-oneal