Must Listen: Oral Arguments now Available in Millard v. Rankin

Oral argument in the case of Millard v. Rankin, the Colorado case where the registry was found to be cruel and unusual punishment, took place yesterday. The audio for the hearing can be found by clicking on the link below:

Millard-v.-Rankin oral argument

The case documents can be found below and were and hosted compiled courtesy of the Mitchell Hamline School of Law:


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

44 thoughts on “Must Listen: Oral Arguments now Available in Millard v. Rankin

  • August 20, 2020

    Millard v Rankin was decided today, noticed the decision on PACER. Not good. Not sure how to post the link.

    Reply
  • February 3, 2020

    Waiting on a decision, in this case, is ridiculous!!! these judges should have a fair and reasonable amount of time to render their decision 2 + years is way too long!!! not to mention 4+ years in MI after the laws were ruled unconstitutional and people are still made to follow them or be jailed!!! something is definitely wrong here. i now think as i type there are too many people make money from these unconstitutional schemes so they need to drag these out as looooooonnnnnnnnnggggggggggggg as possible

    Reply
  • December 7, 2018

    Does anyone know when a decision should be made on this case?

    Reply
    • December 7, 2018

      likely months from now

      Reply
      • January 6, 2020

        Or years.

        Reply
    • May 28, 2019

      Will a favorable decision on Millard v. Rankin case have potential implications on a similar type of challenge to Florida statutes which require SO registration? If so, what is the road map for this overall effort?

      Reply
      • May 28, 2019

        A favorable decision will provide persuasive authority that might used in our challenges. It might also lay the groundwork for an eventual circuit split and SCOTUS granting cert. Even an unfavorable decision might reveal, for our challenges, pitfalls to avoid, arguments to be refined, etc.

        Reply
    • November 19, 2018

      ” But the decision is a step in the right direction for Samoa’s fight against repeated sex offenders ”

      And I wonder how low or high those percentages are of repeat sexual offenders in Samoa. . . Or Just another country drinking that Kool-aid concocted by the U.S.

      Reply
  • November 18, 2018

    Thrown under the bus and run over. Society giddy they have something legally to discrim ate against. Where lawyers are whipping out on their chance to save the United States Constitution.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *