NARSOL Calls Out Patch: STOP the Red Dots!

Raleigh, North Carolina — Every year as Halloween approaches, many Patch media outlets, as well as others, publish articles featuring “red-dot” maps showing addresses, and sometimes names, of persons listed on sexual offense registries. Within the last few years, this practice has been adopted by some local police departments on their Facebook pages. According to the editors and publishers of such pieces, this is done in order to help protect children who will be trick or treating at Halloween.

The National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws (NARSOL) also wants children protected and kept safe. We are in full agreement with that goal. However, there is a total lack of evidence that the publication of these addresses at Halloween keeps children safe. Indeed, the volume of evidence showing no connection at all between Halloween and sexual harm done to children is numerous and well documented.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

13 thoughts on “NARSOL Calls Out Patch: STOP the Red Dots!

  • September 28, 2020

    CDC says:

    “Avoid these higher risk activities to help prevent the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19:

    Participating in traditional trick-or-treating where treats are handed to children who go door to door
    Having trunk-or-treat where treats are handed out from trunks of cars lined up in large parking lots
    Attending crowded costume parties held indoors
    Going to an indoor haunted house where people may be crowded together and screaming
    Going on hayrides or tractor rides with people who are not in your household
    Using alcohol or drugs, which can cloud judgement and increase risky behaviors
    Traveling to a rural fall festival that is not in your community if you live in an area with community spread of COVID-19”

    Reply
  • September 23, 2020

    35 years ago when I was a kid trick or treating there was just as many sex offenders and no registry and I don’t remember any problems. Fact is there was almost no parents with their kids unless they were like under 7. We’d go out in groups and had a great time not this mockery we have now. There wasnt even parents at bus stops. Now big brothers got everyone thinking all the SOs on the list have been out prowling for kids but fails to say very high % is familiar custody and gonna happen no mater what. Then they’re gonna proclaim they need cameras on your kids inside the home, school, sports because only they can protect them because the stats on 1st time offenders is only going up with the registry lmfao.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *