News Sharing and General Commentary

Members, advocates, and all followers of Florida Action Committee’s news website:

Please use this post to bring our attention to fresh news or media content. You may also use the comment area on this post to leave comments on any topic relevant to FAC’s journalistic mission.

Question: Why does this post exist?
Answer: FAC comment policy for all other posts is that comments must be relevant to the post topic and cannot contain links. For this post and only this post, these policies are suspended. You may comment on any topic and may share links. Comments must still be news worthy or informative, as well as related to the registry in some way.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1,001 thoughts on “News Sharing and General Commentary

    • June 19, 2026

      Typical run–of-the-mill sting until I saw this nugget at the bottom of the newstory:

      “I think you should put them all in prison forever. That’s just my opinion. Oh, we get rid of them completely because my experience tells me that they can’t be cured. And if you get one, you interview them. If they’re honest with you, they’ll tell you they can’t be cured. They’re probably in the safest place that they can be,” he said.

      This is exactly why the deck is stacked against us. You have law enforcement blantantly attempting to shape public opinion with their biases, perpetuatig the “these peopel can’t be cured” lies and “they all belong in prison forever” nonsense.

      How do we combat this misinformation? Law enforcement and the media BOTH benefit immensely from promoting fear, public safety rhetoric and child safety propaganda.

      Reply
  • June 12, 2026

    FORM 1099‑FUN
    Written by Quiet too long
    County of Fun – Department of Uncompensated Obligations Fictional Jurisdiction –
    Not Recognized by Any Real
    Government Tax Year(s): 1–22 (Continuous Service)
    Filer: Labor Unit No. 000‑FUN‑247 Resident Compliance Asset Secluded Zone, Phantom District, State of Fun
    Recipient: County of Fun Office of Mandatory Labor & Selective Gratitude Attn: Compliance Extraction Division

    SECTION III: PROFESSIONAL EQUIVALENCY JUSTIFICATION (Narrative Required by Statute)
    In the County of Fun, every duty imposed on the Labor Unit quietly transformed into the equivalent of a full professional occupation,
    each one normally requiring degrees, certifications, and salaries that the County never bothered to provide. The simple act of avoiding people with surveyor‑level precision effectively made the Labor Unit a Professional Land Surveyor, a role that in the real world demands a bachelor’s degree in surveying or geomatics and a respectable salary to match. The requirement to maintain zero friendships and report any attempted human connection elevated the Labor Unit into the realm of behavioral compliance monitoring and probation analysis, fields that typically require degrees in psychology, sociology, or criminal justice, along with the emotional stamina to explain to strangers why they cannot be friends. The obligation to report every associate’s license plate, track plates belonging to vehicles the Labor Unit did not own, and log every incidental job site turned the Labor Unit into a dispatcher and surveillance analyst, professions that normally require emergency‑management training, homeland‑security coursework, and a paycheck that arrives more frequently than never. The travel restrictions, which demanded pre‑approved times, dates, destinations, and reasons, placed the Labor Unit squarely in the shoes of a logistics coordinator, a job that usually comes with a business degree and a cubicle instead of a threat of violation. Enduring picketers, protesters, and hostile observers without reacting transformed the Labor Unit into a crisis‑intervention specialist, a profession that typically requires a psychology degree and hazard pay, neither of which the County of Fun found necessary. The rule that religious events must be viewed only on television, never attended in person, created the accidental role of a religious‑containment policy officer, a position that in the real world would require training in public policy or sociology. The ban on fairs, parades, concerts, and sports events—unless viewed through a screen—made the Labor Unit a public‑safety risk analyst, a job that normally comes with emergency‑management credentials and a salary that doesn’t involve imaginary numbers. The prohibition on higher learning ironically forced the Labor Unit into the role of an education‑policy monitor, a position that typically requires a degree in public administration, while the mandate to perform only County‑assigned duties, even when contradictory or impossible, placed the Labor Unit in the position of an administrative manager, a job that usually requires business‑management training and a functioning support staff. The constant suspicion and scrutiny from the State, which the Labor Unit was expected to endure with grace, effectively made them a psychological‑resilience specialist, a role that in the real world requires advanced degrees and a therapist of one’s own. The requirement to remain available for inspection at all hours transformed the Labor Unit into an on‑call compliance manager, a position that normally comes with overtime pay, sleep, and the occasional weekend. The mandate to maintain zero children placed the Labor Unit into the role of a population‑control officer, a job that typically requires a background in sociology or demographics, while the forced seclusion in remote areas made them an unwilling urban‑planning technician, a profession that usually requires training in geography or land‑use planning. The rule forbidding tax write‑offs turned the Labor Unit into a tax‑compliance auditor, a job that normally requires an accounting degree and a calculator that isn’t powered by despair. The requirement to observe all holidays without pay or relief effectively made the Labor Unit an essential‑services worker, a role that in the real world at least comes with a uniform and a lunch break. The prohibition on gatherings of more than one human transformed the Labor Unit into an isolation‑compliance specialist, a job that typically requires public‑health training and a tolerance for silence. Finally, the demand to maintain an isolated office environment with a functioning security gate elevated the Labor Unit into the dual roles of remote‑office administrator and facility‑security manager, positions that normally require degrees in facilities management, business administration, or security management, along with salaries that acknowledge the difficulty of operating a gate that opens only for inspectors, officers, and the occasional raccoon. In the County of Fun, all of these roles were performed simultaneously, continuously, and without compensation, creating a résumé so dense with professional equivalencies that any real employer would assume it was satire—because it is.

    SECTION IV: VEHICLE USAGE & FORCED‑SECLUSION TRAVEL BURDEN
    The Labor Unit was required to maintain a personal vehicle for all in‑person reporting, inspections, and compliance‑related errands, including but not limited to: reporting license plates, delivering updates, receiving contradictory instructions, and driving to stores located an additional ten miles beyond the average citizen’s route due to forced residential seclusion. Over twenty‑two years, this resulted in 34,320 additional miles of uncompensated travel. At the County of Fun’s fictional reimbursement rate of $0.67 per mile, the total owed is $22,994.40. Actual reimbursement received: $0.00.

    SECTION V: TOTAL COMPENSATION DUE
    Hourly Rate (Average of 21 Professional Roles): $32.66/hr Hours Worked (22 years × 365 days × 24 hours): 192,720 hours Labor Value Owed: $6,296,455.20 Vehicle Costs Owed: $22,994.40 Administrative Overhead (30%): $1,888,936.56 Hazard Pay (15%): $944,468.28 Training & Certification Equivalency: $210,000.00 Equipment & Supplies: $38,500.00 Benefits Not Provided (Health, Retirement, PTO): $1,320,000.00
    TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $10,721,354.44 (Payable immediately or upon the County of Fun’s discovery of basic human decency, whichever occurs first.)

    SECTION VI: CERTIFICATION
    I certify under penalty of imagination that the above is true, accurate, and entirely fictional, and that the County of Fun extracted labor equivalent to twenty‑one professional occupations without providing wages, benefits, training, or even a coupon.
    Signed: Labor Unit No. 000‑FUN‑247 Resident Compliance Asset Phantom District, State of Fun

    FICTIONAL DISCLAIMER This document, its contents, its calculations, its accusations, its invented departments, its invented statutes, its invented obligations, and its entire bureaucratic personality are works of fiction created solely for narrative, satirical, and expressive purposes. Any resemblance to real agencies, real jurisdictions, real officials, real procedures, or real expectations placed upon actual human beings is coincidental, unintentional, and frankly alarming if discovered. The County of Fun does not exist, the Department of Uncompensated Obligations does not exist, and no government—local, state, federal, interdimensional, or otherwise—has authorized, endorsed, reviewed, or requested this form. All job titles, wage equivalents, duties, and professional comparisons are exaggerated for comedic effect and should not be interpreted as legal claims, employment records, tax filings, or evidence of any real obligation. No raccoons were harmed in the creation of the security‑gate narrative, and no inspector has ever actually appeared at 3:01 AM demanding entry, although the author reserves the right to imagine such things freely. By reading this document, the recipient acknowledges that it is satire, that it is not legal advice, and that consulting actual counsel may result in confusion, laughter, or the discovery of biases unrelated to this work. Any attempt to treat this form as real will result in immediate referral to the Office of Fictional Misunderstandings, which also does not exist.

    Reply
  • May 30, 2026

    Voters Beware
    Written by Quiet too long – 05/28/2026

    Roughly 1 in 20 American households – about 5% – contains someone under criminal detention, supervision, or civil control. That strips the constitution from them.
    That is a measurable demographic fact. The United States has about 128 million households, and approximately 6.4 million people are currently under some form of state‑imposed control. including an estimated 900,000 who have completed every term of their sentence yet remain under indefinite civil restrictions.
    From my perspective, these systems do not just affect the 6.4 million individuals directly involved. They also influence the lives of spouses and children – an estimated 10-11 million immediate family members. These 3.25 million families live with the consequences every day, even though they themselves have committed no crime.
    But the deeper issue is civic laws that bypass constitutional values,

    Millions of these individuals – and many of their family members – are discouraged, restricted, or effectively pushed out of the voting process through civil restrictions.
    Some cannot vote because of state laws, Some can vote but believe they cannot, Some avoid voting because of fear, stigma, or confusion created by civil restrictions.
    Some are blocked by ID issues, address instability, or bureaucratic barriers.
    The result is the same:
    A measurable portion of the electorate is silenced by fed and state restrictions. And need to be considered in the percentages map.
    This is not about one political party, This is not about one law ( There are many), This is about the structural reality that when State required civil restrictions compelled towards a state and federal created caste, – they remove voices from the democratic process. Void of constitutional values.

    If you think these laws will never reach your home, consider this: If 10 neighbors are adjacent to these households – 64 million homes – it already has. And history concurs.
    Civil restrictions rarely stay confined to the group they were originally aimed at.
    They expand, Normalize, And become precedent.

    And once a precedent exists for removing or discouraging one group of voters, it becomes easier to apply it to others. especially with the support of people who do not recognize the long‑term consequences. Or are looking for a payday.

    A nation where 1 in 20 households lives under some form of civil control is a nation where every voter should pay attention.
    Because when millions of people are pushed out of the voting process directly or 64 million indirectly – the entire electorate is affected.

    Reply
    • June 13, 2026

      Did you ever hear the expression less is more, well, sometimes more is too much.

      Reply
      • June 13, 2026

        Less’ only works when the system isn’t piling on restrictions. Eventually, more becomes arbitrary – that’s how civil erosion works. If you want the short version: a democracy cannot function when millions of voices are civilly removed. And when the rules get that controlling, Void for Vagueness isn’t a theory – it’s the predictable outcome.

        Reply
        • June 13, 2026

          No one has “civilly removed” our voices. It is our responsibility as citizens to speak up whenever there is an opportunity to shape the law.

          And there are numerous such opportunities. Ever wonder why you don’t have to drive around with a special fluorescent green license plate? Why you don’t have to register every url you visit? Why you don’t have to register your barbershop, grocery store? Why you don’t risk arrest every time you approach a body of water?

          All of these are things that would have actually happened, had we (FAC members) held back our voices from the lawmaking process. When opportunities arose, we didn’t whine that “the system” had taken our voices away from us. Instead, we worked the system for our benefit.

          Reply
          • June 13, 2026

            @Jacob I do appreciate everything FAC has accomplished. My point about being “civilly removed” wasn’t aimed at advocacy groups at all — it was about the people who simply can’t function under the remaining restrictions.
            I’m talking about the folks living under bridges, in cars, or constantly relocating because they can’t legally exist anywhere. People boxed in by residency bans, proximity zones, and reporting rules so tight that they can’t stabilize long enough to participate in anything — not advocacy, not community, not even the basic routines of life.
            Their voices aren’t missing because they’re unwilling. Their voices are missing because the system has pushed them into conditions where functioning is nearly impossible. And once someone is forced into that level of instability, the law eventually creeps up on them and they’re removed entirely. That’s the civil removal I meant.
            And this is why I write so extreme — because some people are living at the edge of survival, not the edge of policy debate.

            Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *