News Sharing and General Commentary
Members, advocates, and all followers of Florida Action Committee’s news website:
Please use this post to bring our attention to fresh news or media content. You may also use the comment area on this post to leave comments on any topic relevant to FAC’s journalistic mission.
Question: Why does this post exist?
Answer: FAC comment policy for all other posts is that comments must be relevant to the post topic and cannot contain links. For this post and only this post, these policies are suspended. You may comment on any topic and may share links. Comments must still be news worthy or informative, as well as related to the registry in some way.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Following the murder and rape of 10-year-old Shani Coke, a Jamaican diaspora member has called on the government to publicize the country’s sex offender registry, arguing that transparency would enhance public safety. The tragic case has reignited debate about whether Jamaica’s existing but private registry should be made accessible to citizens for community awareness and child protection.
However, decades of research from jurisdictions with public registries reveals these systems fail to protect children as intended. A critical finding undermines the entire registry approach: 83% of child sexual assault victims are assaulted by someone they know family members, coaches, teachers, religious leaders, or trusted community figures not strangers who might appear on public lists. This statistic exposes the fundamental flaw in registry logic: the threat comes from within circles of trust, not from identifiable strangers in the community.
Research consistently demonstrates that public sex offender registries do not reduce reoffending rates and may actually increase recidivism risk by creating barriers to successful reintegration, including housing instability, unemployment, and social isolation. Meta-analyses examining 25 years of data found no evidence that public notification increases public safety or prevents sexual violence.
The core problem is that sexual abuse overwhelmingly occurs within established relationships of trust and familiarity, not through encounters with registered strangers. While the call for transparency is understandable given public outrage over Shani Coke’s murder, evidence suggests resources might be better directed toward prevention programs targeting institutions where abuse occurs, comprehensive victim support services, and addressing the reality that most perpetrators are known and trusted individuals rather than registered strangers.# Justice Requires Evidence, Not Assumptions: Why Criminal History Alone Cannot Justify Arrest
In a democratic society, the presumption of innocence is fundamental. Criminal history, while contextually relevant, cannot serve as the sole basis for arrest. To permit otherwise transforms justice from responding to evidence of wrongdoing into punishing status and stigma. Arrests must be justified by current evidence and probable cause demonstrating a specific offense, not by categorical assumptions about past behavior. Each case requires individual assessment on its merits. When authorities rely on criminal records rather than present evidence, they violate due process, create permanent underclasses, and incentivize inadequate investigation. Justice demands that we evaluate what individuals have demonstrably done, not merely who they were.
https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/2026/08/04/diaspora-member-calls-govt-publicise-sex-offender-registry/
References
Cubellis, L., Evans, D. N., & Epperson, M. W. (2018). What does the public think about sex offender registers? Findings from a national Australian study. *PLOS ONE*, 14(5). Retrieved from
Human Rights Watch. (2013). *Raised on the registry: The irreparable harm of placing children on sex offender registries in the U.S.* Retrieved from
Napier, S., Hanson, R. K., & Helmus, L. (2018). What does the public think about sex offender registers? Findings from a national Australian study. *PLOS ONE*, 14(5). Retrieved from
Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART). (n.d.). Chapter 5: Adult sex offender recidivism. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from
R Street Institute. (n.d.). *Rethinking sex-offender registries*. Retrieved from
Zgoba, K. M., & Mitchell, M. (2023). The effectiveness of sex offender registration and notification: A meta-analysis of 25 years of findings. *Journal of Experimental Criminology*, 19, 71-92. Retrieved from
The State-Approved Swamp
Hernando County didn’t hide its homeless probation population. It gave them an address: Buck Hope Road and Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida.
This isn’t an unauthorized encampment. It’s not squatting. It’s not people hiding from the system. This is a state-approved location where GPS-monitored probationers are legally permitted to reside. They register this address with their probation officers. They submit it for weekly approval under community control conditions. They check the box the system requires. They have an approved address.
According to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s sex offender registry, I documented at least seven individuals listing this exact location as their residence in late 2026. Over the months I tracked it, somewhere between seven and fourteen people cycled through. Some stayed weeks. Some stayed months. All of them were on GPS monitoring. All of them were in compliance at least on paper.
Here’s the twisted irony: Flagler County’s media spent weeks condemning offenders for using Cody’s Corner as an unapproved address, framing it as deception and danger. Hernando County gave its probationers an approved address, followed every procedural requirement, maintained the appearance of oversight and control. And the result? People still live in a swamp. They still sleep in tents. They still battle insects, heat, rain, and the constant threat of GPS device failure. The only difference is that Hernando County can say it’s managing the problem.
This is what happens when a system runs out of solutions but refuses to admit failure. You create the illusion of compliance. You approve an address that meets no definition of housing. You tell people they’re following the rules while forcing them to live in conditions that would violate health codes if they were applied to anyone else. You maintain control without providing dignity.
The state-approved encampment at Buck Hope Road isn’t a solution. It’s a bureaucratic surrender dressed up as policy. It’s the system saying: “We can’t house you, we won’t let you transfer, we can’t provide resources, but we can give you a location to register so that when you fail and you will fail we can say you violated the terms of your probation.”
But here’s the part that breaks people even when they’re technically complying with every rule.
When Housing Restrictions Create the Problems They’re Meant to Solve
Florida’s residency restrictions prohibit registered sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of schools, playgrounds, and bus stops—expanding to 2,500 feet in Miami, Orlando, and Tampa. In a state with over 32,000 (in their article) registered offenders, these buffer zones don’t just limit housing options; they eliminate them. Maps of legally permissible addresses often show nothing but industrial zones, swamps, and highway underpasses. The result? Homelessness, instability, and a system that pushes people to the margins.
Restoration Destination in Pahokee emerged in 2009 as a pragmatic response to this crisis. The community houses 198 residents nearly 200 of Pahokee’s registered offenders who pay approximately $500 monthly for housing and support services. For many, it’s the only place they can legally live. Palm Beach County alone has nearly 900 registered offenders navigating these restrictions, and Restoration Destination offers what the broader system cannot: stability, accountability, and a path forward.
Yet the solution reveals a troubling paradox. Concentrating registrants in one isolated community may create the very risk residency laws were designed to prevent. Residents live under GPS monitoring, probation visits, and curfews as strict as 7 p.m. measures that acknowledge ongoing concern even as the community provides structure.
But Florida’s own data suggests a different approach might work better. Studies show that only 5.2% of released sex offenders are re-arrested for new sexual offenses within five years, rising to 13.7% within ten years. These numbers don’t minimize harm, but they do challenge the assumption that isolation equals safety.
People leaving prison need housing, accountability, and support to rebuild their lives. Restoration Destination provides all three not because the system works, but because it doesn’t. Perhaps the question isn’t where to put registrants, but how to help them reintegrate without creating the conditions for failure.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/39999567/florida-restoration-destination-village-paedo-town/
Lawmakers Call for Barron Trump to Testify Over Reported Andrew Tate Communications
Democratic lawmakers are calling for a congressional inquiry into reports that Barron Trump communicated with Andrew Tate in 2024 through mutual associates. Barron Trump, now 20 years old, is not accused of any crime or wrongdoing.
The request comes after Arizona Representative Yassamin Ansari asked the House Oversight Committee to subpoena Barron Trump to testify under oath about any communications he may have had with Andrew Tate.
Lawmakers say they want to determine whether any political figures or associates attempted to influence international legal proceedings involving Andrew and Tristan Tate, who are currently facing criminal charges in the United Kingdom, including rape, human trafficking, and assault. The Tate brothers have denied all allegations.
The White House has stated that the president will not intervene in the Tate brothers’ legal matters. Attorneys representing the Tate brothers have also denied reports of any ties to Barron Trump, calling the claims false.
As of now, there is no public evidence that Barron Trump is suspected of criminal misconduct. The inquiry is focused on whether he may have information relevant to Congress’s investigation.
References
1. Yahoo News – [https://news.yahoo.com/](https://news.yahoo.com/)
2. The Guardian – [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jul/28/barron-trump-tate-brothers-congress](https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jul/28/barron-trump-tate-brothers-congress)
3. Newsweek – [https://www.newsweek.com/](https://www.newsweek.com/)
4. AZ Central – [https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2026/07/29/heres-why-yassamin-ansari-wants-congress-investigate-barron-trump/91079391007/](https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2026/07/29/heres-why-yassamin-ansari-wants-congress-investigate-barron-trump/91079391007/)
5. People – [https://people.com/](https://people.com/)
6. Times of India – [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/andrew-tates-lawyer-warns-trump-of-political-fallout-if-he-doesnt-help-jailed-influencer-in-uk-extradition-case/articleshow/132855695.cms](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/andrew-tates-lawyer-warns-trump-of-political-fallout-if-he-doesnt-help-jailed-influencer-in-uk-extradition-case/articleshow/132855695.cms)
Going to register my child for school. Know who is scared to go? His father. I cant have my kids father at registration because people have an app and report him. Im so freaking upset I have to meet his teacher alone and probably get a side eye because hes not there. Like my child doesn’t have a dad. Because he does. He just cant be with us.
I just prayed for you and all others who have to go through what you are.
Thank you so much for the support.
I understand and it’s utter nonsense. As a father myself on the registry, I can’t attend my kids’ school functions so I usually take them to do something after school to make it up to them. Maybe pitch that idea to your husband.
Oh yes my sons are spoiled and probably more because I am on the registry. They go to fun spot, island h2O, and many rv parks. Just because I not allowed does not mean they can not go. RV park pools are still ok just follow all the calender day rules for PFR. But still not the same as going to simple functions. So sad
Mobile County Sheriff’s Office deputy assigned to the SORNA (Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act) unit resigned while under an internal affairs investigation. The sheriff’s office has not disclosed the reason for the investigation, and because the deputy resigned, the review ended without findings. Since he worked in the SORNA unit, it naturally raises questions about whether the investigation involved a sex offender registration mattet or something entirely unrelated. At this point, there is no public evidence linking the investigation to a sex offender case, and officials have not released any details. Something to follow see if they post anything more.
https://www.lagniappemobile.com/news/mobile_county/deputy-resigns-amid-internal-review/article_2170af5e-3b93-4324-b5a3-6c5aaaad90db.html
https://youtu.be/kl3uEqvxOds?si=W3uiryJhkuBodMb-
Making some video news
I am trying to understand, concerning the registry and the Ellingberg case. From what I have read. This case can open the door for a expost facto case.
If resitition was paid under a criminal case, which it was, how or when did it turn civil? And that the Ellingberg case could be considered for a case for a sex offender post expost facto. From 1992.
Any plans on challenging this? If not, how would you go about it? What kind of Attorney would you need?
This will be covered in our forthcoming lawsuit.