NH: Huge Movement in New Hampshire Legislature

Although it’s not in Florida, the New Hampshire legislature has proposed a bill that shows a lot of insight and indicates that at least somewhere in the country, some legislators are beginning to see the bigger picture and do the right thing.

The bill would prohibit the retroactive application of the sex offender registry.

A sex offender required to register with the state would register based on the laws in effect at the time of the offense, not based on the laws then in effect.

Rep. Cynthia L. Chase, who sponsored the bill said that she supports the bill “because sex offenders shouldn’t live in fear of being killed by vigilantes.”

Let’s hope her bill gets lots of support and also hope that others follow suit.

 


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “NH: Huge Movement in New Hampshire Legislature

  • January 6, 2016

    It is about time. New Hampshire should lead the example for every state. I was already impressed that New Hampshire passed a law that prohibits law makers from making residency restriction laws. That was amazing.

    Reply
  • January 6, 2016

    Man, the State of New Hampshire is awesome. This is the same state that passed a law that prohibits any law maker from passing residency restriction laws if I’m correct. in other words, they made it illegal. How kick ass is that?….Florida should learn from the examples of New Hampshire and not bend over every time the Federal government of private entities say so. Florida is a constitutional embarrassment.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *