NICHOLS V. UNITED STATES – Transcript – A registrant's duty to "register" after leaving the US

Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Nichols v. US. The case that will decide whether a registrant had an obligation to update his registry after leaving the country.

The transcript can be found here: https://floridaactioncommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Nichols-v-United-States-Supreme-Court-Transcript.pdf

The transcript shows two things:

1) If the registration requirements are so confusing that the most brilliant legal minds can’t seem to figure them out, how is the common man supposed to?

2) If registered sex offenders are “so dangerous” why would they take the time, effort and money to extradite a registrant who moved out of the country back to the US?

The latter, goes to show that the registry is not about public safety, but about punishing registrants at all costs.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *