Non-Punitive in Name Only: How Ellingburg v. United States Threatens Florida’s “Civil” Registry Model
The Doctrine of Finality is the bedrock of the American criminal justice system—the silent promise that once a citizen pays their debt, the ledger is closed. But in Florida, that ledger is written in disappearing ink. For nearly thirty years, Tallahassee has perfected a system where the rules of the Florida sex offender registry change every legislative session, effectively re-litigating over 30,000 “closed” cases every January. Since 1997, the state has tightened the screws over 20 times, transforming this supposedly “civil” administrative tool into what the nation’s highest court now recognizes as a post-constitutional reality.
On January 20, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered a unanimous 9-0 decision in Ellingburg v. United States—the most significant legal “smoking gun” since 2003 for those challenging the retroactive application of registry laws.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Thank you for all of the great comments. After reading them I realized that I needed to do better and to give people something they could work with to move forward. As a result I have just created a comprehensive advocacy guide for registrants in Florida. God bless everyone and may we remember those who have not made it this far.
https://thewillardreport.substack.com/p/capitalizing-on-ellingburg-v-united
Uncle FAFO
Very comprehensive and nicely done!
Great job!
Thank you!
This doc rocks! Thank you!
An excellent synopsis that can apply not only in Florida. If the registry is punishment, does that open the door to bill-of-attainder challenges as well? That could topple the entire registry edifice. My only fear of having individuals move forward with an ex post facto challenge is that we might get an unfavorable decision. I think that advocacy organizations such as FAC, NARSOL or ACSOL should together pick a case very carefully.
Yes, I think it is time for a national summit between the executives (and councils) of all of the RSOLs and the other groups (WAR, RAA and others).
There should be a national summit.
Link is saying page not found.
the government has no issues telling you they break the laws because they also have no issues rubbing in your face they are above said laws ..
And how did any of that stop the elitist in power from continuing to sex traffic children?
If you are aware of anything, notify law enforcement.
It seems to me (a layman) that any defense lawyer who is currently representing a PFR on a FTR charge should argue the Ex Post Facto grounds now that “Ellingburg v. United States Threatens Florida’s ‘Civil’ Registry Model” as stated in the headline and text of the article. Perhaps a federal defender or public defender?
No. The judge said “I sentence you to X number of years in prison and X number of years of probation. Furthermore, I find that you are a sex offender, and you will be required to register as a sexual offender. That is the sentence of this court.”
My lawyer turned to me and said that this was good news. He told me to never forget that the judge had sentenced me to be a sexual offender and not a predator. He said that it was important that the judge had orally pronounced it in court.
After they took my fingerprints inside the courtroom (at the end of the plea colliquey and sentencing, they took me downstairs where they took my fingerprints for a second time. I asked them why they were doing it twice, and they told me that the second time was for the sex offender registry.)
Then I went back to my jail cell and was shipped to prison about 2 weeks later.
(Over 17 years later the State Attorney reopened the case (6 years after I had finished all probation and paid all fees). They reopened it and ruled that I was a predator (in absentia and without service of process).
I can’t believe I’ve stayed in Fl all these years with the out of control maniacs in charge of law-making.