OH: City brings lawsuit to try to force registrant to move.
V.B. was living in his home in Warren, Ohio when he caught a sex offense case. Fortunately for V.B., the conviction did not result in a prison sentence; instead, he was placed on probation. After his October 2025 conviction, V.B. did exactly what the law required – he reported his residence. That residence, where he had been living long before the offense, happened to be within 1,000 feet of a school. Rather than recognizing that V.B. was already lawfully housed and under court supervision, the City of Warren filed a civil lawsuit seeking to enjoin him from remaining in his home.
This case highlights a fundamental problem with sex offender residency restrictions: they are applied mechanically and retroactively, without regard to fairness, proportionality, or reality. V.B. did not move closer to a school after his conviction; the school did not suddenly appear next door; and no allegation was made that his presence posed any new or specific risk. Yet the city’s position is that compliance with the law — registering and reporting his address — triggers the loss of his home.
When a person is told that the only way to comply with the law is to abandon their residence, destabilize their life, and risk homelessness, the worst punishment is no longer the sentence imposed by the court — it is a second, collateral sentence imposed by local government.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Cantalamessa v Ball – Ohio SORR
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I owned my home 13 years prior, I served a very short sentence and got out on probation. I spent nearly 6 years living away from my wife at nights. I was finally able to work for decent money and remodeled the house and sold it. I was banned from living in my own home. It was a very depressing time in my life.
This is going to be an interesting case. Not sure of Ohio’s laws however the fact that he already resides there will have some weight. It definitely violates the 4th and 14th Amendments to force him to move.
The only saving grace is that Ohio’s residency restrictions are only civil penalties so they can only sue, not lock you up. But still they can use it to seize your property.
Do we know if he owns his home or is simply renting/living with someone else??
Hope he is compensated via return civil lawsuit and an injunction if he loses this lawsuit brought on by the govt
If i had more $$ than I knew what to do with…I’d pay for his legal counsel…