Queensland registry to include safeguards against vigilantism
The Queensland government will introduce legislation to parliament today to establish a sex offender registry, but unlike it’s US counterpart the legislation will include safeguards aimed at stopping vigilantism and prohibiting people from targeting offenders on the registry.
Rather than blasting registrants information out there publicly, and allowing others to scrape the database and create their own copycat websites, the Queensland registry is structured across three tiers:
1- A publicly accessible webpage for offenders who have breached reporting duties or whose whereabouts are unknown, including their names, photos, and year of birth.
2- An application system allowing residents to receive images (only photos—not names or birthdates) of high-risk offenders living in their area.
3- A tool for parents or guardians to request confirmation whether someone with unsupervised access to their child is a registered offender
But importantly, it comes with penalties to deter vigilantism or harassment of registrants: violating these protections carries penalties of up to 10 years in prison. Additional offenses—such as unauthorized dissemination of registry information or behavior intended to intimidate—could result in up to three years’ jail time.
By contrast, U.S. sex-offender registry systems (e.g., Megan’s Laws) provide public access to registrant details with little or no legal deterrence against harassment or vigilante actions. In fact, registries have often facilitated abuse and violence, for example: a registered offender’s home in Washington, D.C., was burned down after the local sheriff distributed leaflets detailing his alleged “sadistic” offenses, a mentally disabled man was beaten by vigilantes, mistaken for a sex offender simply because of registry proximity, Stephen Marshall, used the registry in Maine to locate and murder two registrants, Michael Mullen posed as an FBI agent and killed two registrants and dozens more.
Beyond the violence targeting registrants, public registries have fostered ongoing social ostracism, harassment, employment and housing denial, and significant collateral damage to registrants’ families—such as spouses and children.
The intention is clear: Queensland’s registry is intended to furnish parents and the community with safety information—yet enforce measures to prevent misuse or mob justice, the U.S. simply doesn’t give a darn.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I would add that having such laws against vigilantism means absolutely nothing when they are not enforced and instead the vigilante is patted on the back by police and prosecutors as we have seen many times. The registry should not exist period. Even when it is kept just for police, the police become vigilantes themselves sometimes.
A safeguard for me would be to not have a registry at all. Especially one that put many of us on it retro-actively. And as the registry was an American idea, now other countries are copying what we do, as is done with many things the U.S comes up with.
Having said that, if we had to have a registry (Seems we do) then it not being public would at least increase our and our family’s safety.
it’s a fact known as old as time… placing a sign on someone’s back that says kick me and then tell everyone they can’t kick the person will get the person kicked…. It’s absolutely impossible to create a registry or any form of public humiliation and not have repercussions to the person and the family of the person branded with the star of David .
To add to your image: It’s like placing teeny-tiny words saying “Don’t” and monster, bold, neon letters stating “Kick Me!” as a “Hey, we TOLD them not to kick anyone.”