Ruling allows Tampa man to avoid sex offender registration until he pays $10K fine

The case could upend part of Florida’s sex offender laws, officials say.

A Tampa man who spent 12 years in prison for molesting two young girls at a community pool does not have to register as a sexual offender until he pays a $10,000 fine, two Florida courts have ruled.

A judge in the Hillsborough Circuit Court and a panel of three judges in Florida’s 2nd District Court of Appeal in April said Ray La Vel James has not been released from the sanctions imposed in 2004, and he does not fit the definition of a sexual offender until the fine is paid, according to court records. James was released from prison in 2016 and is listed as a transient in Tampa, records show, but he has not paid the $10,000 fine.

James, who represents himself in court, said prosecutors have misused “or” and “a” and “the” when interpreting sexual-offender laws. James’ victories in two courtrooms could force lawmakers to rewrite a state statute to fix what Hillsborough County State Attorney Andrew Warren called a “massive loophole” in Florida law.

“This would shake up laws across Florida,” Warren said. “It’s a very rigid interpretation of the statute.”

Last week, Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody asked the 16 judges on Florida’s 2nd District Court of Appeal to rehear the case. The April ruling “raises a question of great public importance” for victims of sexual assault, Moody said in a motion for a hearing. The outcome could “have significant practical implications for thousands — and perhaps tens of thousands — of sexual offenders” in Florida, Moody wrote.

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

27 thoughts on “Ruling allows Tampa man to avoid sex offender registration until he pays $10K fine

  • June 14, 2020

    When a registrant finds a flaw in the law and it’s wording there’s a loophole which needs fixing, yet when lawmakers find flaws that benefit their wallets the can gets kicked down the road. Perhaps bills shouldn’t be rushed to become laws and be written by someone that’s smarter than a fly on the wall. Florida’s laws make no sense and the state needs true criminal justice reform. Allow ex felons to vote especially if they’re done with the restrictions placed on them by the state of conviction. I’m grateful that I was allowed to vote while I lived in Florida. Nothing like a felon that can monkey up the system of one corrupt state.

    Reply
  • June 10, 2020

    So the Florida AG thinks that all sex offenders committed the crime of sexual assault? To me that’s something an ordinary person on the street would think— Misinformation, uneducated to the truth. A state attorney general should know better.

    Reply
    • June 10, 2020

      She’s pandering to victim rights organizations instead of truth and justice. Wait till Lauren Book becomes Governor and Ron Book Attorney General. It’s not matter of if; but when.

      Reply
  • June 9, 2020

    It’s ironic (and hypocritical) that the state attorney whines about “a very rigid interpretation of the statute” yet the State, when prosecuting registry violations, insists on that very rigid interpretation to suit its own goals. So which way do you want it, Mr. State Attorney: rigid or not?

    Reply
    • June 10, 2020

      As recent events have shown law enforcement has no bounds when it comes to trying to hide , lie ,cover up. Manipulate, alter, a situation to make them look better and to make a conviction even to the point that it sometimes causes death. This being the case ,how can anyone have confidence that a registry of any kind is even any where accurate much less beneficial for anything except punishment, propaganda, and political advancement.while being totally useless besides unconstitutional.

      Reply
  • June 9, 2020

    Everytime I report, they always confirm my lifetime federal probationary status. Seems to me that I should be removed from the registry or not be required to regisince I am on lifetime supervised release. Hence, all sanctions of my conviction will never be satisfied.

    Reply
    • June 9, 2020

      If you are in the 2nd Circuit (Franklin, Gadsden, Jefferson, Leon, Liberty, and Wakulla) you certainly have good precedent.

      Reply
  • June 9, 2020

    Damn who’s a good attorney in Polk so I don’t fuck this up I’m going through hell on probation from a registration violation would like to move outta state…quickly!

    Reply
    • June 9, 2020

      The lawyers on our referral page are very knowledgeable in these areas. If you are looking to transfer probation, it’s not necessarily related to the registry – you might want to ask your criminal defense attorney (the one who represented you on your case).

      Reply
    • June 9, 2020

      Legally the only thing that might prevent you from moving out of state is the location that you intend to move to. If you have family within that state that is beneficial to you. You cannot be barred from moving anywhere within Florida even while on probation provided all “not punishment” sanctions are met.

      Reply
    • November 18, 2020

      Lmao! Go get em’! I am hunting them down in Miami-Dade no-doubt!!

      I was charged with a felony and violated probation for “failure to register” as a S.O., spent 3 months during last years holidays (Nov., Dec., & Jan.) in the can and had to spend 6 months after my release on Comm. Control. before being put back on SO Probation. Worst thing is really that now after 11 years has passed on my original conviction, I now have a fresh felony and this inhibits me from getting certain benefits (loans, jobs, etc.), so you better believe I am going to file a 3.850 to overturn this B.S. trap they have us in. If you think about it, it is idiotically redundant to have those on active supervision to be required to register with the local sheriffs. So after-all, the legislative intent may very well have been for only those that have been released from their supervision be ones required to register. And if not, too late! Let’s all file against this atrocity!

      Reply
  • June 9, 2020

    You do kind of wonder if this is a little bit of karma for the state trying to say that the fines and costs by people trying to register to vote under the new amendment are “sanctions.”’

    Reply
    • June 9, 2020

      True – they can’t really have it both ways. Either a fee is a “sanction” or it’s not.

      Reply
      • June 9, 2020

        Of course they can have it both ways. They do it all the time. You don’t honestly think that this guy is coming off the registry anytime soon if ever, do you? Doesn’t matter what the courts say. Until such time as the card off the director of FDLE in handcuffs…

        Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *