Sex Offender Approved as Class Representative in Modem Class Action Lawsuit
A small bit of encouragement came from a civil class action lawsuit, IN RE ARRIS CABLE MODEM CONSUMER LITIGATION, Dist. Court, ND California 2018.
Plaintiffs, a group of consumers, are suing cable modem manufacturer, Arris, in a class action lawsuit. The case has nothing to do with our cause, except that one of the class representative plaintiffs happens to be a person required to register as a sex offender.
Attorneys for Arris, suggested the individual is not a suitable plaintiff because of his status.
The Court (Northern District of California) came to his defense, saying, “a district court should find inadequacy “only where the representative’s credibility is questioned on issues directly relevant to the litigation or there are confirmed examples of dishonesty, such as a criminal conviction for fraud.” Not only did the Court find the individual’s sex offense (which was from 1993) irrelevant, but also likely inadmissible.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Here is a little message in the park I gave about the Sex Offender Registry and how it is ANTI-Christian…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nK6O5-3pfKc
Thank you Robert, for voicing what I’ve thought for so long. Our religious leaders often sit by on the sidelines, speechless, as atrocities take place that are obviously anti-religious, anti-christian, anti whatever that one’s faith is based on.
And yet so many will throw their support behind politicians that pervert truth, honesty and justice in return for power. This could be the reason that so many are leaving their faith in droves — primarily young people who seem to see things much clearer than the older generation who seem willing to sell our nations’ soul for short-sighted gains.
This is amazing news that the court sees us as people once again
race : a group of people who share a common past or history
it’s not class
don’t know why this is even posted this is no big deal and certainly not the first time a person’s past was not allowed to be in a civil trial, and this is normal. a drunk pulled out in front of me and cause of the amount of insurance i had they found an ambulance chasing lawyer to sue me and 2 companies as i used to travel for work for 10 mil each in fed court and the ambulance chasing lawyer tried to bring that up for me and judge said jury will hear nothing about my background