Should managing a soccer team be an issue?
The recent report that Michael Jolley stepped away from his role as manager of Bury FC (a soccer team in the UK) after his past came to light raises a question we keep coming back to: at what point does a completed sentence for a sex offense ever end? Jolley was not accused of any new misconduct, nor was there any allegation that his presence in soccer posed a present danger. Yet the mere fact of his status made continued employment untenable. This mirrors what we see every day in the United States — people barred from lawful work not because of what they are doing, but because of what they once did.
Jolly was quoted in the NY Times as saying, “now in 2025, 16 and a half years later, my CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) check has long since shown as clear but in the interests of transparency and openness, I still ensure that any prospective employers have visibility of the issue if I do receive any offer of employment, and I did so once again in my discussions with Bury FC.” Regardless, he could never live down the one fact.
Whether it’s managing a soccer team, working behind a bar, hauling trash, or training co-workers at a fast-food restaurant, the underlying issue is the same: if someone is permitted to live and work in the community, interaction with the community is unavoidable. Employment is not a privilege reserved for those with perfect histories; it is a stabilizing force that reduces risk and promotes accountability. When society treats lawful employment itself as a problem, we are no longer talking about public safety, we are talking about permanent exclusion. And that should concern everyone, regardless of the country, the profession, or the offense.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
There have been times I have considered trying to work again but why bother when I can just lose my job so easily? Screw that, keep those social security checks rolling.
The upcoming work requirement for health care (from the USG) that is going to be implemented is going to run into trouble with PFRs, et al, if they are not able to secure work. The govt is putting hurdles into the way of life for many with their requirements which contradict each other when they cannot be satisfied as needed. If you are listed or previously listed, then chances of securing employment can be hard, and if no employment is secured, then the new health care mandate may be hard to satisfy (unless there is a conviction exception such as there is for unemployment benefits).
The govt is their own worst enemy when it comes to shortsightedness of these things and not considering the big picture of their petty actions.