Study: Digital punishment, lateral surveillance & the sex offense registry
The maintenance of a public sex offense registry has been codified as a non-punitive civil policy since the 2003 Supreme Court case of Smith v. Doe. But since then, sex offense registries have transformed from a centralized state repository of information to a sprawling digital archive of personal data about people required to register. We identify and report the current technological capabilities of state-run sex offense registries through a 50-state survey and draw from the analysis to argue that the digital turn has changed the form and function of the registry. While the Court saw registries as analogous to a trip to an archive, our data show how registries now exert digital punishment and lateral surveillance through state-enabled technical capabilities on registry websites. In a departure from earlier schemes that required users to conduct a targeted search on a government-run website, registrants’ personal information is now routinely harvested and posted for profit motives in the private sector. Such shifts require a new analysis of sex offense registries; one that specifically interrogates at what point technology transforms a civil, purportedly non-punitive public policy into a decidedly punitive measure.
lageson-sudduth-2025-digital-punishment-lateral-surveillance-the-sex-offense-registry
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I hope that the lawyers fighting on our side will continue to push this very issue.
Everyone should know that dead people are on the registry. Shaming the families well past their death. That is the lowest low in my opinion. I looked yesterday and I ran out of time viewing all the “Deceased” registrants that are still on the viewable list. This should be an automatic removal. But we all know if they stay up, the powers to be get more funding, most likely.
I cannot prove that but if not, what purpose does that serve? And Many families have no idea they can get them removed after death because they are not contacted to do so.
One can literally say “I see dead people” and not be wrong when they read the registry. Is it my (mis?)understanding they were to be left on for a short bit of time post-death so others can see they’re deceased before they’re removed? As anyone really done a FOIA request of the PFR data that is submitted to the USG to see if the numbers and their breakdown do include the deceased?
It’s always been about punishment, and they’ve always known it and we know it to.. From slavery and Jim Crow laws to unethical experiments like injecting syphilis into Black men or releasing radiation on the public, the government has repeatedly acted wrongly. The mistreatment of Native Americans, Japanese American internment, COINTELPRO, and tragedies like Ruby Ridge and Waco show how deep these issues go. It doesn’t matter if you’re right—the American government has often been in the wrong, and history has proven that. doesnt pay to be right when the USA gov is wrong.