The Sex Offender Registry Failed Them: Former Sex Offender Unit Deputy Convicted of Sex Offenses

What use is the Sex Offender Registry when it did absolutely nothing to prevent sex offending from taking place right under it’s nose? We’re talking about a former Cobb County (Georgia) Deputy Sheriff assigned to the agency’s Sex Offender Unit, that was sentenced to federal prison for distributing child pornography!

According to a press release from the U.S. Government, ” [he] had been employed by the Cobb County Sheriff’s office for approximately 17 years. During the time that he was distributing child pornography online he worked in the agency’s Sex Offender Unit where his job duties included maintaining, verifying, and updating the list of registered sex offenders residing in Cobb County.”

Talk about a completely and utterly useless tool! It’s like a fire destroying a firehouse!!! You literally can’t make this stuff up!

The people of Georgia should be demanding their legislators answer the question of how the registry could have failed in such an epic way? If the registry can’t even be useful in stopping sex offending in the sheriff’s offices own sex offender unit, why do we even have this thing?

 


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

20 thoughts on “The Sex Offender Registry Failed Them: Former Sex Offender Unit Deputy Convicted of Sex Offenses

  • January 2, 2023

    Average Joe will read this and think, “oh, oh, registry failing! better make tougher laws on those low lifes!” This is the unfortunate reality of the propaganda they have been fed.

    Reply
    • January 2, 2023

      Jed
      I agree , instead of saying it’s failing, it would be better said, It is a complete failure. Accomplishing nothing and costing Billions.

      Reply
      • January 6, 2023

        Today is Human trafficking awareness day in 2021 8,142 women and 1,292 men were identified and rescued as either victims or survivors. Absolutely no one on the sex offender registry was identified as being involved in any way with these victims. What does that tell you about who there putting on this registry?

        Reply
        • January 7, 2023

          The registry is a way for politicians to make the ‘unknowing’ feel safe because of the political acts involved in a power grab. It’s amazing how many ignorant citizens are able to vote. Just ‘throw out a carrot’ and the politician can get their vote.

          Reply
    • January 4, 2023

      Also news dated Jan. 4, 2023 . Now that California has removed its statute of limitations on sex offenses , the two that played ROMEO AND JULIET in the September 1968 film are now suing for 500 million dollars because they were under age at the time the movie was made. It has a sex seen in it. This movie has been a must watch for many studying literature in schools for decades.
      So now I guess the producers of the movie can be charged with sex crimes as well as all that watched the movie. That ought to be about 100 million more people on the sex offender registry. That ought to make the pushers of the registry really happy.

      Reply
      • January 5, 2023

        To confirm information go to nytimes.com. Movies
        Olivia Hussein. And Leonard Whittington. Lawsuit against Paramount Pictures

        Reply
  • December 2, 2022

    BTW, @FAC, this is a great series you have started here and great to see others providing stories along the way in the comments. I can see in the future a sub-menu above with these within.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *