VA: Senseless New Law Takes Effect

On January 1, 2016 a new “supplement” to the Virginia Sex Offenders Registry was launched, which added over five thousand names to the list.

People convicted of sex offenses on or after July 1, 1980, and before July 1, 1994 are now being added to the registry in a senseless move to beef up their counts by adding unnecessary names to an unnecessary list.

We’re talking about punishing people who committed an offense 35 years ago! At minimum, we’re adding a punishment decades after the fact, which is horribly unfair to both the offender and the public.

It’s unfair to the offender because they are taking someone who hasn’t re-offended in decades (or else they would presumably be on the list for an offense after 1994) and destabilizing them.

It’s unfair to the public because they are diluting the list with individuals who pose no greater threat to the public than someone who has never offended (studies show that even the worst offender poses no greater threat than someone who has never offended, after 17 years living offense free http://responsesystemspanel.whs.mil/Public/docs/meetings/Sub_Committee/20140225_CSS/Materials_Presenters/05_HighRiskOffenders_MayNotBeHighForever_Hanson_Harris_Helmus_Thornton.pdf)

So what sense does it make to not only increase a state’s sex offender list by about 25% overnight, when those 25% account for negligible risk?


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *